BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Jens Malmros

Jens Malmros contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Methodologyphysics.soc-phSocial and Information NetworksApplicationsmath.PR

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2014arXiv

Respondent-driven sampling and an unusual epidemic

Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) is frequently used when sampling hard-to-reach and/or stigmatized communities. RDS utilizes a peer-driven recruitment mechanism where sampled individuals pass on participation coupons to at most $c$ of their acquaintances in the community ($c=3$ being a common choice), who then in turn pass on to their acquaintances if they choose to participate, and so on. This process of distributing coupons is shown to behave like a new Reed-Frost type network epidemic model, in which becoming infected corresponds to receiving a coupon. The difference from existing network epidemic models is that an infected individual can not infect (i.e.\ sample) all of its contacts, but only at most $c$ of them. We calculate $R_0$, the probability of a major "outbreak", and the relative size of a major outbreak in the limit of infinite population size and evaluate their adequacy in finite populations. We study the effect of varying $c$ and compare RDS to the corresponding usual epidemic models, i.e.\ the case of $c=\infty$. Our results suggest that the number of coupons has a large effect on RDS recruitment. Additionally, we use our findings to explain previous empirical observations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Random Walks on Directed Networks: Inference and Respondent-driven Sampling

Respondent driven sampling (RDS) is a method often used to estimate population properties (e.g. sexual risk behavior) in hard-to-reach populations. It combines an effective modified snowball sampling methodology with an estimation procedure that yields unbiased population estimates under the assumption that the sampling process behaves like a random walk on the social network of the population. Current RDS estimation methodology assumes that the social network is undirected, i.e. that all edges are reciprocal. However, empirical social networks in general also have non-reciprocated edges. To account for this fact, we develop a new estimation method for RDS in the presence of directed edges on the basis of random walks on directed networks. We distinguish directed and undirected edges and consider the possibility that the random walk returns to its current position in two steps through an undirected edge. We derive estimators of the selection probabilities of individuals as a function of the number of outgoing edges of sampled individuals. We evaluate the performance of the proposed estimators on artificial and empirical networks to show that they generally perform better than existing methods. This is in particular the case when the fraction of directed edges in the network is large.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Respondent-driven Sampling on Directed Networks

Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) is a commonly used substitute for random sampling when studying hidden populations, such as injecting drug users or men who have sex with men, for which no sampling frame is known. The method is an extension of the snowball sample method and can, given that some assumptions are met, generate unbiased population estimates. One key assumption, not likely to be met, is that the acquaintance network in which the recruitment process takes place is undirected, meaning that all recruiters should have the potential to be recruited by the person they recruit. Here we investigate the potential bias of directedness by simulating RDS on real and artificial network structures. We show that directedness is likely to generate bias that cannot be compensated for unless the sampled individuals know how many that potentially may have recruited them (i.e. their indegree), which is unlikely in most situations. Based on one known parameter, we propose an estimator for RDS on directed networks when only outdegrees are observed. By comparison of current RDS estimators' performances on networks with varying structures, we find that our new estimator, together with a recent estimator, which requires the population size as a known quantity, have relatively low level of estimate error and bias. Based on our new estimator, sensitivity analysis can be made by varying values of the known parameter to take uncertainty of network directedness and error in reporting degrees into account. Finally, we have developed a bootstrap procedure for the new estimator to construct confidence intervals.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access