BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Jayme L. Szwarcfiter

Jayme L. Szwarcfiter contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Discrete MathematicsData Structures and AlgorithmsArtificial Intelligencemath.CO

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
6works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Edge Intersection Graphs of Paths on a Triangular Grid

We introduce a new class of intersection graphs, the edge intersection graphs of paths on a triangular grid, called EPGt graphs. We show similarities and differences from this new class to the well-known class of EPG graphs. A turn of a path at a grid point is called a bend. An EPGt representation in which every path has at most $k$ bends is called a B$_k$-EPGt representation and the corresponding graphs are called B$_k$-EPGt graphs. We provide examples of B$_{2}$-EPG graphs that are B$_{1}$-EPGt. We characterize the representation of cliques with three vertices and chordless 4-cycles in B$_{1}$-EPGt representations. We also prove that B$_{1}$-EPGt graphs have Strong Helly number $3$. Furthermore, we prove that B$_{1}$-EPGt graphs are $7$-clique colorable.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Empirical Evaluation of Project Scheduling Algorithms for Maximization of the Net Present Value

This paper presents an empirical performance analysis of three project scheduling algorithms dealing with maximizing projects' net present value with unrestricted resources. The selected algorithms, being the most recently cited in the literature, are: Recursive Search (RS), Steepest Ascent Approach (SAA) and Hybrid Search (HS). The main motivation for this research is the lack of knowledge about the computational complexities of the RS, SAA, and HS algorithms, since all studies to date show some gaps in the analysis. Furthermore, the empirical analysis performed to date does not consider the fact that one algorithm (HS) uses a dual search strategy, which markedly improved the algorithm's performance, while the others don't. In order to obtain a fair performance comparison, we implemented the dual search strategy into the other two algorithms (RS and SAA), and the new algorithms were called Recursive Search Forward-Backward (RSFB) and Steepest Ascent Approach Forward-Backward (SAAFB). The algorithms RSFB, SAAFB, and HS were submitted to a factorial experiment with three different project network sampling characteristics. The results were analyzed using the Generalized Linear Models (GLM) statistical modeling technique that showed: a) the general computational costs of RSFB, SAAFB, and HS; b) the costs of restarting the search in the spanning tree as part of the total cost of the algorithms; c) and statistically significant differences between the distributions of the algorithms' results.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Weighted Connected Matchings

A matching $M$ is a $\mathscr{P}$-matching if the subgraph induced by the endpoints of the edges of $M$ satisfies property $\mathscr{P}$. As examples, for appropriate choices of $\mathscr{P}$, the problems Induced Matching, Uniquely Restricted Matching, Connected Matching and Disconnected Matching arise. For many of these problems, finding a maximum $\mathscr{P}$-matching is a knowingly NP-Hard problem, with few exceptions, such as connected matchings, which has the same time complexity as usual Maximum Matching problem. The weighted variant of Maximum Matching has been studied for decades, with many applications, including the well-known Assignment problem. Motivated by this fact, in addition to some recent researches in weighted versions of acyclic and induced matchings, we study the Maximum Weight Connected Matching. In this problem, we want to find a matching $M$ such that the endpoint vertices of its edges induce a connected subgraph and the sum of the edge weights of $M$ is maximum. Unlike the unweighted Connected Matching problem, which is in P for general graphs, we show that Maximum Weight Connected Matching is NP-Hard even for bounded diameter bipartite graphs, starlike graphs, planar bipartite, and bounded degree planar graphs, while solvable in linear time for trees and subcubic graphs. When we restrict edge weights to be non negative only, we show that the problem turns to be polynomially solvable for chordal graphs, while it remains NP-Hard for most of the cases when weights can be negative. Our final contributions are on parameterized complexity. On the positive side, we present a single exponential time algorithm when parameterized by treewidth. In terms of kernelization, we show that, even when restricted to binary weights, Weighted Connected Matching does not admit a polynomial kernel when parameterized by vertex cover under standard complexity-theoretical hypotheses.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

FPT and kernelization algorithms for the k-in-a-tree problem

The three-in-a-tree problem asks for an induced tree of the input graph containing three mandatory vertices. In 2006, Chudnovsky and Seymour [Combinatorica, 2010] presented the first polynomial time algorithm for this problem, which has become a critical subroutine in many algorithms for detecting induced subgraphs, such as beetles, pyramids, thetas, and even and odd-holes. In 2007, Derhy and Picouleau [Discrete Applied Mathematics, 2009] considered the natural generalization to $k$ mandatory vertices, proving that, when $k$ is part of the input, the problem is $\mathsf{NP}$-complete, and ask what is the complexity of four-in-a-tree. Motivated by this question and the relevance of the original problem, we study the parameterized complexity of $k$-in-a-tree. We begin by showing that the problem is $\mathsf{W[1]}$-hard when jointly parameterized by the size of the solution and minimum clique cover and, under the Exponential Time Hypothesis, does not admit an $n^{o(k)}$ time algorithm. Afterwards, we use Courcelle's Theorem to prove fixed-parameter tractability under cliquewidth, which prompts our investigation into which parameterizations admit single exponential algorithms; we show that such algorithms exist for the unrelated parameterizations treewidth, distance to cluster, and distance to co-cluster. In terms of kernelization, we present a linear kernel under feedback edge set, and show that no polynomial kernel exists under vertex cover nor distance to clique unless $\mathsf{NP} \subseteq \mathsf{coNP}/\mathsf{poly}$. Along with other remarks and previous work, our tractability and kernelization results cover many of the most commonly employed parameters in the graph parameter hierarchy.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

An $O^*(1.1939^n)$ time algorithm for minimum weighted dominating induced matching

Say that an edge of a graph $G$ dominates itself and every other edge adjacent to it. An edge dominating set of a graph $G=(V,E)$ is a subset of edges $E' \subseteq E$ which dominates all edges of $G$. In particular, if every edge of $G$ is dominated by exactly one edge of $E'$ then $E'$ is a dominating induced matching. It is known that not every graph admits a dominating induced matching, while the problem to decide if it does admit it is NP-complete. In this paper we consider the problems of finding a minimum weighted dominating induced matching, if any, and counting the number of dominating induced matchings of a graph with weighted edges. We describe an exact algorithm for general graphs that runs in $O^*(1.1939^n)$ time and polynomial (linear) space. This improves over any existing exact algorithm for the problems in consideration.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Exact algorithms for dominating induced matchings

Say that an edge of a graph G dominates itself and every other edge adjacent to it. An edge dominating set of a graph G = (V,E) is a subset of edges E' of E which dominates all edges of G. In particular, if every edge of G is dominated by exactly one edge of E' then E' is a dominating induced matching. It is known that not every graph admits a dominating induced matching, while the problem to decide if it does admit is NP-complete. In this paper we consider the problem of finding a minimum weighted dominating induced matching, if any, of a graph with weighted edges. We describe two exact algorithms for general graphs. The algorithms are efficient in the cases where G admits a known vertex dominating set of small size, or when G contains a polynomial number of maximal independent sets.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access