Researcher profile

Javier Pulgar

Javier Pulgar contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Long-term collaboration with strong friendship ties improves academic performance in remote and hybrid teaching modalities in high school physics

Collaboration among students is fundamental for knowledge building and competency development. Yet, the effectiveness of student collaboration depends on the extent that these interactions occur under conditions that favor commitment, trust, and decision-making among those who interact. The sanitary situation and the transition to emergency remote teaching have added new challenges for collaboration, mainly because now, Information and Communication Technologies mediate students' interactions. This study first explores the effectiveness of different collaborative relationships on physics from a sample of secondary students from two schools located in rural and urban areas in southern Chile. We used Social Network Analysis to map students' academic prestige, collaboration, and friendship ties. We define a strong association if two students are declared mutually as friends. Using multiple linear regression models, we found positive effects of collaboration on grades, particularly among students working with friends (strong ties). Then, the second study corresponds to a quasi-experiment on four classes at the analyzed urban school during the following academic year. Here, students attended hybrid sessions to test whether the effects of collaboration found on the first study were stable throughout two semesters. Following the same procedures as in the exploratory phase, we found that the initial effects of collaboration on grades are negative for all collaborative variables, while strong working ties afford academic gains later into the year. These results contribute to the literature of collaboration in physics education and its effectiveness, taking into account social relationships and the needed time for developing beneficial collective processes among students in the classroom.

preprint2020arXiv

Investigating how students collaborate to generate physics problems through structured tasks

Traditionally, scholars in physics education research pay attention to students solving well-structured learning activities, which provide restricted room for collaboration and idea-generation due to their close-ended nature. In order to encourage the socialization of information among group members, we utilized a real-world problem where students were asked to generate a well-structured physics task, and investigated how student groups collaborated to create physics problems for younger students at an introductory physics course at a university in northern Chile. Data collection consists of audio recording the group discussions while they were collaborating to develop their physics problems as well as the solutions they created to their problems. Through interviews, we accessed students' perceptions on the task and its challenges. Results suggest that generating problems is an opportunity for students to propose ideas and make decisions regarding the goals of the problem, concepts and procedures, contextual details and magnitudes and units to introduce in their generated problems. In addition, we found evidence that groups tested the validity of their creations by engaging in strategies often observed with algebra-based physics problems, such as mathematical procedures and qualitative descriptions of the physics embedded in the problem, yet groups invested more time with algebra-based strategies compared to more qualitative descriptions. Students valued the open-ended nature of the task and recognized its benefits in utilizing physics ideas into context, which in turn enabled collaboration in a way not experienced with traditional algebra-based problems. These findings support the use of generative activities as a pathway for students to engage in real-world physics problems that allow for a range and variety of collective processes and ideas.

preprint2020arXiv

Undergrad classroom cooperation and academic performance: Beneficial for real-world-like problems but detrimental for algebra-based problems

For several decades, scholars have studied cooperation and its outcomes in the educational context. Yet, we lack a complete understanding of how different instructional strategies impact the relationship between cooperation and learning. Here we studied how different instructional strategies led to different social configurations and their differences in individual academic performance in an experiment with 82 first-year students from an introductory physics course. Surprisingly, we found that students who actively seek out information on multiple peers are less likely to achieve good performance on well-structured (algebra-based) problems, whereas, for ill-structured (real-world-like) problems, this effect depended on the features of the learning environment. Besides, we observed that good performance on ill and well-structured problems responded to different social network configurations. In a highly clustered network (which contains redundant information), students performed well-structured problems better than ill-structured problems. In contrast, students with access to network structural holes (which enable access to more diverse information) performed ill-structured problems better than well-structured problems. Finally, ill-structured problems could promote creative thinking, provided that instructors guide the solving process and motivate students to engage in the appropriate cognitive demands these problems entail. Our results suggest that teaching and instructional strategies play an important role in cooperative learning; therefore, educators implementing cooperative learning methods have to accompany them with adequate instructional strategy.