Researcher profile

Javier Alcazar

Javier Alcazar contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

GEO: Enhancing Combinatorial Optimization with Classical and Quantum Generative Models

We introduce a new framework that leverages machine learning models known as generative models to solve optimization problems. Our Generator-Enhanced Optimization (GEO) strategy is flexible to adopt any generative model, from quantum to quantum-inspired or classical, such as Generative Adversarial Networks, Variational Autoencoders, or Quantum Circuit Born Machines, to name a few. Here, we focus on a quantum-inspired version of GEO relying on tensor-network Born machines and referred to hereafter as TN-GEO. We present two prominent strategies for using TN-GEO. The first uses data points previously evaluated by any quantum or classical optimizer, and we show how TN-GEO improves the performance of the classical solver as a standalone strategy in hard-to-solve instances. The second strategy uses TN-GEO as a standalone solver, i.e., when no previous observations are available. Here, we show its superior performance when the goal is to find the best minimum given a fixed budget for the number of function calls. This might be ideal in situations where the cost function evaluation can be very expensive. To illustrate our results, we run these benchmarks in the context of the portfolio optimization problem by constructing instances from the S\&P 500 and several other financial stock indexes. We also comprehensively compare state-of-the-art algorithms in a generalized version of the portfolio optimization problem. The results show that TN-GEO is among the best compared to these state-of-the-art algorithms; a remarkable outcome given the solvers used in the comparison have been fine-tuned for decades in this real-world industrial application. We see this as an important step toward a practical advantage with quantum-inspired models and, subsequently, with quantum generative models.

preprint2021arXiv

Quantum algorithm for credit valuation adjustments

Quantum mechanics is well known to accelerate statistical sampling processes over classical techniques. In quantitative finance, statistical samplings arise broadly in many use cases. Here we focus on a particular one of such use cases, credit valuation adjustment (CVA), and identify opportunities and challenges towards quantum advantage for practical instances. To improve the depths of quantum circuits for solving such problem, we draw on various heuristics that indicate the potential for significant improvement over well-known techniques such as reversible logical circuit synthesis. In minimizing the resource requirements for amplitude amplification while maximizing the speedup gained from the quantum coherence of a noisy device, we adopt a recently developed Bayesian variant of quantum amplitude estimation using engineered likelihood functions (ELF). We perform numerical analyses to characterize the prospect of quantum speedup in concrete CVA instances over classical Monte Carlo simulations.

preprint2020arXiv

Classical versus Quantum Models in Machine Learning: Insights from a Finance Application

Although several models have been proposed towards assisting machine learning (ML) tasks with quantum computers, a direct comparison of the expressive power and efficiency of classical versus quantum models for datasets originating from real-world applications is one of the key milestones towards a quantum ready era. Here, we take a first step towards addressing this challenge by performing a comparison of the widely used classical ML models known as restricted Boltzmann machines (RBMs), against a recently proposed quantum model, now known as quantum circuit Born machines (QCBMs). Both models address the same hard tasks in unsupervised generative modeling, with QCBMs exploiting the probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics and a candidate for near-term quantum computers, as experimentally demonstrated in three different quantum hardware architectures to date. To address the question of the performance of the quantum model on real-world classical data sets, we construct scenarios from a probabilistic version out of the well-known portfolio optimization problem in finance, by using time-series pricing data from asset subsets of the S\&P500 stock market index. It is remarkable to find that, under the same number of resources in terms of parameters for both classical and quantum models, the quantum models seem to have superior performance on typical instances when compared with the canonical training of the RBMs. Our simulations are grounded on a hardware efficient realization of the QCBMs on ion-trap quantum computers, by using their native gate sets, and therefore readily implementable in near-term quantum devices.