Source author record

Javad Shaabani

Javad Shaabani appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
2topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

A New Look to Three-Factor Fama-French Regression Model using Sample Innovations

The Fama-French model is widely used in assessing the portfolio's performance compared to market returns. In Fama-French models, all factors are time-series data. The cross-sectional data are slightly different from the time series data. A distinct problem with time-series regressions is that R-squared in time series regressions is usually very high, especially compared with typical R-squared for cross-sectional data. The high value of R-squared may cause misinterpretation that the regression model fits the observed data well, and the variance in the dependent variable is explained well by the independent variables. Thus, to do regression analysis, and overcome with the serial dependence and volatility clustering, we use standard econometrics time series models to derive sample innovations. In this study, we revisit and validate the Fama-French models in two different ways: using the factors and asset returns in the Fama-French model and considering the sample innovations in the Fama-French model instead of studying the factors. Comparing the two methods considered in this study, we suggest the Fama-French model should be considered with heavy tail distributions as the tail behavior is relevant in Fama-French models, including financial data, and the QQ plot does not validate that the choice of the normal distribution as the theoretical distribution for the noise in the model.