Source author record

Jatin Ganhotra

Jatin Ganhotra appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Computation and Language Artificial Intelligence

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works

2topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2022arXiv

Towards End-to-End Integration of Dialog History for Improved Spoken Language Understanding

Dialog history plays an important role in spoken language understanding (SLU) performance in a dialog system. For end-to-end (E2E) SLU, previous work has used dialog history in text form, which makes the model dependent on a cascaded automatic speech recognizer (ASR). This rescinds the benefits of an E2E system which is intended to be compact and robust to ASR errors. In this paper, we propose a hierarchical conversation model that is capable of directly using dialog history in speech form, making it fully E2E. We also distill semantic knowledge from the available gold conversation transcripts by jointly training a similar text-based conversation model with an explicit tying of acoustic and semantic embeddings. We also propose a novel technique that we call DropFrame to deal with the long training time incurred by adding dialog history in an E2E manner. On the HarperValleyBank dialog dataset, our E2E history integration outperforms a history independent baseline by 7.7% absolute F1 score on the task of dialog action recognition. Our model performs competitively with the state-of-the-art history based cascaded baseline, but uses 48% fewer parameters. In the absence of gold transcripts to fine-tune an ASR model, our model outperforms this baseline by a significant margin of 10% absolute F1 score.

preprint2021arXiv

Does Dialog Length matter for Next Response Selection task? An Empirical Study

In the last few years, the release of BERT, a multilingual transformer based model, has taken the NLP community by storm. BERT-based models have achieved state-of-the-art results on various NLP tasks, including dialog tasks. One of the limitation of BERT is the lack of ability to handle long text sequence. By default, BERT has a maximum wordpiece token sequence length of 512. Recently, there has been renewed interest to tackle the BERT limitation to handle long text sequences with the addition of new self-attention based architectures. However, there has been little to no research on the impact of this limitation with respect to dialog tasks. Dialog tasks are inherently different from other NLP tasks due to: a) the presence of multiple utterances from multiple speakers, which may be interlinked to each other across different turns and b) longer length of dialogs. In this work, we empirically evaluate the impact of dialog length on the performance of BERT model for the Next Response Selection dialog task on four publicly available and one internal multi-turn dialog datasets. We observe that there is little impact on performance with long dialogs and even the simplest approach of truncating input works really well.

preprint2019arXiv

A Large-Scale Corpus for Conversation Disentanglement

Disentangling conversations mixed together in a single stream of messages is a difficult task, made harder by the lack of large manually annotated datasets. We created a new dataset of 77,563 messages manually annotated with reply-structure graphs that both disentangle conversations and define internal conversation structure. Our dataset is 16 times larger than all previously released datasets combined, the first to include adjudication of annotation disagreements, and the first to include context. We use our data to re-examine prior work, in particular, finding that 80% of conversations in a widely used dialogue corpus are either missing messages or contain extra messages. Our manually-annotated data presents an opportunity to develop robust data-driven methods for conversation disentanglement, which will help advance dialogue research.