BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for researchDiscover
Workspaces
Network
Opportunities
Account
Researcher profile
Jarosław Grytczuk contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.
Trust snapshot
Actions
Identity and collaboration
Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.
Log in to claimDirect collaboration
Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.
Research graph
Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Published work
A famous theorem of Dilworth asserts that any finite poset of width $k$ can be decomposed into $k$ chains. We study the following problem: given a Borel poset $P$ of finite width $k$, is it true that it can be decomposed into $k$ Borel chains? We give a positive answer in a special case of Borel posets embeddable into the real line. We also prove a dual theorem for posets whose comparability graphs are locally countable.
This survey presents some combinatorial problems with number-theoretic flavor. Our journey starts from a simple graph coloring question, but at some point gets close to a dangerous territory of the Riemann Hypothesis. We will mostly focus on open problems, but we will also provide some simple proofs, just for adorning.
There exists a variety of coloring problems for plane graphs, involving vertices, edges, and faces in all possible combinations. For instance, in the \emph{entire coloring} of a plane graph we are to color these three sets so that any pair of adjacent or incident elements get different colors. We study here some problems of this type from algebraic perspective, focusing on the \emph{facial} variant. We obtain several results concerning the \emph{Alon-Tarsi number} of various graphs derived from plane embeddings. This allows for extensions of some previous results for \emph{choosability} of these graphs to the game theoretic variant, know as \emph{paintability}. For instance, we prove that every plane graph is facially entirely \emph{$8$-paintable}, which means (metaphorically) that even a color-blind person can facially color the entire graph form lists of size $8$.
In any vertex coloring of a graph some edges have differently colored ends (\emph{good} edges) and some are monochromatic (\emph{bad} edges). In a proper coloring all edges are good. In a \emph{majority coloring} it is enough that for every vertex $v$, the number of bad edges incident to $v$ does not exceed the number of good edges incident to $v$. A well known result of Lovász \cite{Lovasz} asserts that every finite graph has a majority $2$-coloring. A similar statement for countably infinite graphs is a challenging open problem, known as the \emph{Unfriendly Partition Conjecture}. We consider a natural list variant of majority coloring. A graph is \emph{majority $k$-choosable} if it has a majority coloring from any lists of size $k$ assigned arbitrarily to the vertices. We prove that every countable graph is majority $4$-choosable. We also consider a natural analog of majority coloring for directed graphs. We prove that every countable digraph is also majority $4$-choosable. We pose list and directed analogs of the Unfriendly Partition Conjecture, stating that every countable graph is majority $2$-choosable and every countable digraph is majority $3$-choosable.
We consider some coloring issues related to the famous Erd\H {o}s Discrepancy Problem. A set of the form $A_{s,k}=\{s,2s,\dots,ks\}$, with $s,k\in \mathbb{N}$, is called a \emph{homogeneous arithmetic progression}. We prove that for every fixed $k$ there exists a $2$-coloring of $\mathbb N$ such that every set $A_{s,k}$ is \emph{perfectly balanced} (the numbers of red and blue elements in the set $A_{s,k}$ differ by at most one). This prompts reflection on various restricted versions of Erd\H {o}s' problem, obtained by imposing diverse confinements on parameters $s,k$. In a slightly different direction, we discuss a \emph{majority} variant of the problem, in which each set $A_{s,k}$ should have an excess of elements colored differently than the first element in the set. This problem leads, unexpectedly, to some deep questions concerning completely multiplicative functions with values in $\{+1,-1\}$. In particular, whether there is such a function with partial sums bounded from above.
Let $π$ be a permutation of the set $[n]=\{1,2,\dots, n\}$. Two disjoint order-isomorphic subsequences of $π$ are called twins. How long twins are contained in every permutation? The well known Erdős-Szekeres theorem implies that there is always a pair of twins of length $Ω(\sqrt{n})$. On the other hand, by a simple probabilistic argument Gawron proved that for every $n\geqslant 1$ there exist permutations with all twins having length $O(n^{2/3})$. He conjectured that the latter bound is the correct size of the longest twins guaranteed in every permutation. We support this conjecture by showing that almost all permutations contain twins of length $Ω(n^{2/3}/\log n^{1/3})$. Recently, Bukh and Rudenko have tweaked our proof and removed the log-factor. For completeness, we also present our version of their proof (see Remark 1.2 below on the interrelation between the two proofs). In addition, we study several variants of the problem with diverse restrictions imposed on the twins. For instance, if we restrict attention to twins avoiding a fixed permutation $τ$, then the corresponding extremal function equals $Θ(\sqrt{n})$, provided that $τ$ is not monotone. In case of block twins (each twin occupies a segment) we prove that it is $(1+o(1))\frac{\log n}{\log\log n}$, while for random permutations it is twice as large. For twins that jointly occupy a segment (tight twins), we prove that for every $n$ there are permutations avoiding them on all segments of length greater than $24$.
An \emph{additive coloring} of a graph $G$ is an assignment of positive integers $\{1,2,...,k\}$ to the vertices of $G$ such that for every two adjacent vertices the sums of numbers assigned to their neighbors are different. The minimum number $k$ for which there exists an additive coloring of $G$ is denoted by $η(G)$. We prove that $η(G)\leqslant 468$ for every planar graph $G$. This improves a previous bound $η(G)\leqslant 5544$ due to Norin. The proof uses Combinatorial Nullstellensatz and coloring number of planar hypergrahs. We also demonstrate that $η(G)\leqslant 36$ for 3-colorable planar graphs, and $η(G)\leqslant 4$ for every planar graph of girth at least 13. In a group theoretic version of the problem we show that for each $r\geqslant 2$ there is an $r$-chromatic graph $G_{r}$ with no additive coloring by elements of any Abelian group of order $r$.
A sequence S is nonrepetitive if no two adjacent blocks of S are the same. In 1906 Thue proved that there exist arbitrarily long nonrepetitive sequences over 3 symbols. We consider the online variant of this result in which a nonrepetitive sequence is constructed during a play between two players: Bob is choosing a position in a sequence and Alice is inserting a symbol on that position taken from a fixed set A. The goal of Bob is to force Alice to create a repetition, and if he succeeds, then the game stops. The goal of Alice is naturally to avoid that and thereby to construct a nonrepetitive sequence of any given length. We prove that Alice has a strategy to play arbitrarily long provided the size of the set A is at least 12. This is the online version of the Theorem of Thue. The proof is based on nonrepetitive colorings of outerplanar graphs. On the other hand, one can prove that even over 4 symbols Alice has no chance to play for too long. The minimum size of the set of symbols needed for the online version of Thue's theorem remains unknown.
A necklace splitting theorem of Goldberg and West asserts that any k-colored (continuous) necklace can be fairly split using at most k cuts. Motivated by the problem of Erdős on strongly nonrepetitive sequences, Alon et al. proved that there is a (t+3)-coloring of the real line in which no necklace has a fair splitting using at most t cuts. We generalize this result for higher dimensional spaces. More specifically, we prove that there is k-coloring of R^{d} such that no cube has a fair splitting of size t (using at most t hyperplanes orthogonal to each of the axes), provided k>(t+4)^{d}-(t+3)^{d}+(t+2)^{d}-2^{d}+d(t+2)+3. We also consider a discrete variant of the multidimensional necklace splitting problem in the spirit of the theorem of de Longueville and Živaljević. The question how many axes aligned hyperplanes are needed for a fair splitting of a d-dimensional k-colored cube remains open.
(Note. The results of this manuscript has been merged and published with another paper of the same authors: A new approach to nonrepetitve sequences.) A repetition of size $h$ ($h\geqslant1$) in a given sequence is a subsequence of consecutive terms of the form: $xx=x_1... x_hx_1... x_h$. A sequence is nonrepetitive if it does not contain a repetition of any size. The remarkable construction of Thue asserts that 3 different symbols are enough to build an arbitrarily long nonrepetitive sequence. We consider game-theoretic versions of results on nonrepetitive sequences. A nonrepetitive game is played by two players who pick, one by one, consecutive terms of a sequence over a given set of symbols. The first player tries to avoid repetitions, while the second player, in contrast, wants to create them. Of course, by simple imitation, the second player can force lots of repetitions of size 1. However, as proved by Pegden, there is a strategy for the first player to build an arbitrarily long sequence over 37 symbols with no repetitions of size $>1$. Our techniques allow to reduce 37 to 6. Another game we consider is an erase-repetition game. Here, whenever a repetition occurs, the repeated block is immediately erased and the next player to move continues the play. We prove that there is a strategy for the first player to build an arbitrarily long nonrepetitive sequence over 8 symbols. Our approach is inspired by a new algorithmic proof of the Lovász Local Lemma due to Moser and Tardos and previous work of Moser (his so called entropy compression argument).
A sequence $S=s_{1}s_{2}..._{n}$ is \emph{nonrepetitive} if no two adjacent blocks of $S$ are identical. In 1906 Thue proved that there exist arbitrarily long nonrepetitive sequences over 3-element set of symbols. We study a generalization of nonrepetitive sequences involving arithmetic progressions. We prove that for every $k\geqslant 1$ and every $c\geqslant 1$ there exist arbitrarily long sequences over at most $(1+\frac{1}{c})k+18k^{c/c+1}$ symbols whose subsequences indexed by arithmetic progressions with common differences from the set $\{1,2,...,k\}$ are nonrepetitive. This improves a previous bound obtained in \cite{Grytczuk Rainbow}. Our approach is based on a technique introduced recently in \cite{GrytczukKozikMicek}, which was originally inspired by a constructive proof of the Lovász Local Lemma due to Moser and Tardos \cite{MoserTardos}. We also discuss some related problems that can be successfully attacked by this method.