Source author record

Janusz Garecki

Janusz Garecki appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

12works
4topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

12 published item(s)

preprint2016arXiv

Canonical superenergy and angular supermomentum complexes in general relativity and some of their applications

Many years ago we have introduced into general relativity, {\bf GR}, the canonical superenergy tensors, $S_i^{~k}$, and the canonical angular supermomentum tensors, $S^{ikl}=(-)S^{kil}$, matter and gravitation. We have obtained these tensors by special averaging of the differences of the canonical energy-momentum and canonical angular momentum. The averaging was performed in Riemann normal coordinates, {\bf RNC(P)}; {\bf P} is beginning of these coordinates. About four years ago we have observed that these tensors can also be obtained in other, simpler way, by using the canonical superenergy and angular super momentum complexes, $_K S_i^{~k}$, and, $_K S~^{ikl}=(-)_K S^{kil}$, respectively. Such complexes can be introduced into {\bf GR} in a natural way starting from canonical energy-momentum and angular momentum complexes. In this paper, at first, we define the canonical superenergy and angular supermomentum complexes in {\bf GR} and then, we apply them to analyze of a closed system, {\bf CS}, Trautman's radiative spacetimes, {\bf TRS}, and Friedman universes, {\bf FU}. Finally, we compare these complexes and the results obtained with their help with the canonical superenergy and angular supermomentum tensors and results obtained with them in past. In Appendix, for convenience, we summarize our old approach to canonical superenergy and angular supermomentum tensors.

preprint2016arXiv

Do gravitational waves carry energy-momentum? A reappraisal

After direct detection gravitational radiation in 2015 many authors are publishing remakes of their old articles about this radiation. I decided to follow this line in my Lecture delivered at the Conference "Varcosmofun'16" (12-17 September 2016, Szczecin, Poland, EU). Namely, I have presented at this Conference an updated summary of my past articles on gravitational radiation. As a base for my presentation I have used mainly the article published in 2002 in Annalen der Physik \cite{Gar3} and the articles \cite{Gar4}. In these past articles I have showed that the real gravitational waves which possess a non-vanishing Riemann tensor always carry energy-momentum (and also angular momentum). Our proof have used canonical superenergy and supermomentum tensor for gravitational field in former articles and the averaged relative energy-momentum tensor in latter. In this article we confine to the energy-momentum only.

preprint2011arXiv

Is torsion needed in a theory of gravity? A reappraisal

It is known that General Relativity ({\bf GR}) uses a Lorentzian Manifold $(M_4;g)$ as a geometrical model of the physical spacetime. The metric $g$ is required to satisfy Einstein's equations. Since the 1960s many authors have tried to generalize this model by introducing torsion. In this paper we discuss the present status of torsion in a theory of gravity. Our conclusion is that the general-relativistic model of the physical spacetime is sufficient for the all physical applications and it seems to be the best satisfactory.

preprint2009arXiv

Statefinders and observational measurement of superenergy

The superenergy of the universe is a tensorial quantity and it is a general relativistic analogue of the Appell's energy of acceleration in classical mechanics. We propose the measurement of this quantity by the observational parameters such as the Hubble parameter, the deceleration parameter, the jerk and the snap (kerk) known as statefinders. We show that the superenergy of gravity requires only the Hubble and deceleration parameter to be measured, while the superenergy of matter requires also the measurement of the higher-order characteristics of expansion: the jerk and the snap. In such a way, the superenergy becomes another parameter characterizing the evolution of the universe.

preprint2007arXiv

Energy, angular momentum, superenergy and angular supermomentum in conformal frames

We find the rules of the conformal transformation for the energetic quantities such as the Einstein energy-momentum complex, the Bergmann-Thomson angular momentum complex, the superenergy tensor, and the angular supermomentum tensor of gravitation and matter. We show that the conformal transformation rules for the matter parts of both the Einstein complex and the Bergmann-Thomson complex are fairly simple, while the transformation rules for their gravitational parts are more complicated. We also find that the transformational rules of the superenergy tensor of matter and the superenergy tensor of gravity are quite complicated except for the case of a pure gravity. In such a special case the superenergy density as well as the sum of the superenergy density and the matter energy density are invariants of the conformal transformation. Besides, in that case, a conformal invariant is also the Bel-Robinson tensor which is a part of the superenergy tensor. As for the angular supermomentum tensor of gravity - it emerges that its transformational rule even for a pure gravity is quite complicated but this is not the case for the angular supermomentum tensor of matter. Having investigated some technicalities of the conformal transformations, we also find the conformal transformation rule for the curvature invariants and, in particular, for the Gauss-Bonnet invariant in a spacetime of arbitrary dimension.

preprint2007arXiv

On Energy and Momentum of the Friedman and Some More General Universes

Recently some authors concluded that the energy and momentum of the Fiedman universes, flat and closed, are equal to zero locally and globally (flat universes) or only globally (closed universes). The similar conclusion was also done for more general only homogeneous universes (Kasner and Bianchi type I). Such conclusions originated from coordinate dependent calculations performed only in comoving Cartesian coordinates by using the so-called {\it energy-momentum complexes}. By using new coordinate independent expressions on energy and momentum one can show that the Friedman and more general universes {\it needn't be energetic nonentity}.

preprint2007arXiv

On Energy of the Friedman Universes in Conformally Flat Coordinates

Recently many authors have calculated the energy of the Friedman universes by using double index energy-momentum complexes in Cartesian comoving coordinates $(t,x,y,z)$ and concluded that the flat and closed Friedman universes are energy-free. We show in this paper by using Einstein canonical energy-momentum complex and by doing calculations in conformally flat coordinates that such conclusion is incorrect. The results obtained in this paper are compatible with the results of the our previous paper \cite{Gar07} where we have used coordinate-independent averaged relative energy-momentum tensors to analyze Friedman universes.

preprint2006arXiv

The averaged tensors of the relative energy-momentum and angular momentum in general relativity and some their applications

There exist at least a few different kind of averaging of the differences of the energy-momentum and angular momentum in normal coordinates {\bf NC(P)} which give tensorial quantities. The obtained averaged quantities are equivalent mathematically because they differ only by constant scalar dimensional factors. One of these averaging was used in our papers [1-8] giving the {\it canonical superenergy and angular supermomentum tensors}. In this paper we present another averaging of the differences of the energy-momentum and angular momentum which gives tensorial quantities with proper dimensions of the energy-momentum and angular momentum densities. But these averaged relative energy-momentum and angular momentum tensors, closely related to the canonical superenergy and angular supermomentum tensors, {\it depend on some fundamental length $L>0$}. The averaged relative energy-momentum and angular momentum tensors of the gravitational field obtained in the paper can be applied, like the canonical superenergy and angular supermomentum tensors, to {\it coordinate independent} analysis (local and in special cases also global) of this field. We have applied the averaged relative energy-momentum tensors to analyze vacuum gravitational energy and momentum and to analyze energy and momentum of the Friedman (and also more general) universes. The obtained results are very interesting, e.g., the averaged relative energy density is {\it positive definite} for the all Friedman universes.