Source author record

Jannick Borowitz

Jannick Borowitz appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
1topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

Engineering Fully Dynamic $Δ$-Orientation Algorithms

A (fully) dynamic graph algorithm is a data structure that supports edge insertions, edge deletions, and answers certain queries that are specific to the problem under consideration. There has been a lot of research on dynamic algorithms for graph problems that are solvable in polynomial time by a static algorithm. However, while there is a large body of theoretical work on efficient dynamic graph algorithms, a lot of these algorithms were never implemented and empirically evaluated. In this work, we consider the fully dynamic edge orientation problem, also called fully dynamic $Δ$-orientation problem, which is to maintain an orientation of the edges of an undirected graph such that the out-degree is low. If edges are inserted or deleted, one may have to flip the orientation of some edges in order to avoid vertices having a large out-degree. While there has been theoretical work on dynamic versions of this problem, currently there is no experimental evaluation available. In this work, we close this gap and engineer a range of new dynamic edge orientation algorithms as well as algorithms from the current literature. Moreover, we evaluate these algorithms on real-world dynamic graphs. The best algorithm considered in this paper in terms of quality, based on a simple breadth-first search, computes the optimum result on more than 90% of the instances and is on average only 2.4% worse than the optimum solution.