Researcher profile

Jan Bergenthum

Jan Bergenthum contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 11 - Baseline
1works
0followers
1topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2007arXiv

Comparison of semimartingales and Lévy processes

In this paper, we derive comparison results for terminal values of $d$-dimensional special semimartingales and also for finite-dimensional distributions of multivariate Lévy processes. The comparison is with respect to nondecreasing, (increasing) convex, (increasing) directionally convex and (increasing) supermodular functions. We use three different approaches. In the first approach, we give sufficient conditions on the local predictable characteristics that imply ordering of terminal values of semimartingales. This generalizes some recent convex comparison results of exponential models in [Math. Finance 8 (1998) 93--126, Finance Stoch. 4 (2000) 209--222, Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. 237 (2002) 73--113, Finance Stoch. 10 (2006) 222--249]. In the second part, we give comparison results for finite-dimensional distributions of Lévy processes with infinite Lévy measure. In the first step, we derive a comparison result for Markov processes based on a monotone separating transition kernel. By a coupling argument, we get an application to the comparison of compound Poisson processes. These comparisons are then extended by an approximation argument to the ordering of Lévy processes with infinite Lévy measure. The third approach is based on mixing representations which are known for several relevant distribution classes. We discuss this approach in detail for the comparison of generalized hyperbolic distributions and for normal inverse Gaussian processes.