Researcher profile

Jamie M. Foster

Jamie M. Foster contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A Continuum of Physics-Based Lithium-Ion Battery Models Reviewed

Physics-based electrochemical battery models derived from porous electrode theory are a very powerful tool for understanding lithium-ion batteries, as well as for improving their design and management. Different model fidelity, and thus model complexity, is needed for different applications. For example, in battery design we can afford longer computational times and the use of powerful computers, while for real-time battery control (e.g. in electric vehicles) we need to perform very fast calculations using simple devices. For this reason, simplified models that retain most of the features at a lower computational cost are widely used. Even though in the literature we often find these simplified models posed independently, leading to inconsistencies between models, they can actually be derived from more complicated models using a unified and systematic framework. In this review, we showcase this reductive framework, starting from a high-fidelity microscale model and reducing it all the way down to the Single Particle Model (SPM), deriving in the process other common models, such as the Doyle-Fuller-Newman (DFN) model. We also provide a critical discussion on the advantages and shortcomings of each of the models, which can aid model selection for a particular application. Finally, we provide an overview of possible extensions to the models, with a special focus on thermal models. Any of these extensions could be incorporated into the microscale model and the reductive framework re-applied to lead to a new generation of simplified, multi-physics models.

preprint2022arXiv

Data-Driven Optimal Closures for Mean-Cluster Models: Beyond the Classical Pair Approximation

This study concerns the mean-clustering approach to modelling the evolution of lattice dynamics. Instead of tracking the state of individual lattice sites, this approach describes the time evolution of the concentrations of different cluster types. It leads to an infinite hierarchy of ordinary differential equations which must be closed by truncation using a so-called closure condition. This condition approximates the concentrations of higher-order clusters in terms of the concentrations of lower-order ones. The pair approximation is the most common form of closure. Here, we consider its generalization, termed the "optimal approximation", which we calibrate using a robust data-driven strategy. To fix attention, we focus on a recently proposed structured lattice model for a nickel-based oxide, similar to that used as cathode material in modern commercial Li-ion batteries. The form of the obtained optimal approximation allows us to deduce a simple sparse closure model. In addition to being more accurate than the classical pair approximation, this ``sparse approximation'' is also physically interpretable which allows us to a posteriori refine the hypotheses underlying construction of this class of closure models. Moreover, the mean-cluster model closed with this sparse approximation is linear and hence analytically solvable such that its parametrization is straightforward. On the other hand, parametrization of the mean-cluster model closed with the pair approximation is shown to lead to an ill-posed inverse problem.