BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for researchDiscover
Workspaces
Network
Opportunities
Account
Researcher profile
James Tee contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.
Trust snapshot
Actions
Identity and collaboration
Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.
Log in to claimDirect collaboration
Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.
Research graph
Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Published work
This article serves as a supplement to the recently published call for participation in a Research Topic [1] that is timed to commemorate the 75th anniversary of Shannon's pioneering 1948 paper [2]. Here, we include some citations of key and relevant literature, which reflect our opinions/perspectives on the proposed topic, and serve as guidance to potential submissions.
Memory information in the brain is commonly believed to be stored in the synapse. However, a recent groundbreaking electrophysiology research has raised the possibility that memory information may actually be stored inside the neuron itself. Drawing on information theory and communications system engineering perspectives, we examine the problem of how memory information might be transmitted reliably between neurons. We identify 2 types of errors that affect neuronal communications (i.e., channel error and source error), along with plausible error mitigation solutions. We confirm the feasibility of these solutions using simulations. Four alternative hypotheses of the synapse's function are also proposed. We conclude by highlighting some research directions, along with potential areas of application.
Value [4][5] is typically modeled using a continuous representation (i.e., a Real number). A discrete representation of value has recently been postulated [6]. A quantized representation of probability in the brain was also posited and supported by experimental data [7]. Value and probability are inter-related via Prospect Theory [4][5]. In this paper, we hypothesize that intertemporal choices may also be quantized. For example, people may treat (or discount) 16 days indifferently to 17 days. To test this, we analyzed an intertemporal task by using 2 novel models: quantized hyperbolic discounting, and quantized exponential discounting. Our work here is a re-examination of the behavioral data previously collected for an fMRI study [8]. Both quantized hyperbolic and quantized exponential models were compared using AIC and BIC tests. We found that 13/20 participants were best fit to the quantized exponential model, while the remaining 7/20 were best fit to the quantized hyperbolic model. Overall, 15/20 participants were best fit to models with a 5-bit precision (i.e., 2^5 = 32 steps). In conclusion, regardless of hyperbolic or exponential, quantized versions of these models are better fit to the experimental data than their continuous forms. We finally outline some potential applications of our findings.
Conventional and current wisdom assumes that the brain represents probability as a continuous number to many decimal places. This assumption seems implausible given finite and scarce resources in the brain. Quantization is an information encoding process whereby a continuous quantity is systematically divided into a finite number of possible categories. Rounding is a simple example of quantization. We apply this information theoretic concept to develop a novel quantized (i.e., discrete) probability distortion function. We develop three conjunction probability gambling tasks to look for evidence of quantized probability representations in the brain. We hypothesize that certain ranges of probability will be lumped together in the same indifferent category if a quantized representation exists. For example, two distinct probabilities such as 0.57 and 0.585 may be treated indifferently. Our extensive data analysis has found strong evidence to support such a quantized representation: 59/76 participants (i.e., 78%) demonstrated a best fit to 4-bit quantized models instead of continuous models. This observation is the major development and novelty of the present work. The brain is very likely to be employing a quantized representation of probability. This discovery demonstrates a major precision limitation of the brain's representational and decision-making ability.
The question of continuous-versus-discrete information representation in the brain is a fundamental yet unresolved question. Historically, most analyses assume a continuous representation without considering the discrete alternative. Our work explores the plausibility of both, answering the question from a communications systems engineering perspective. Using Shannon's communications theory, we posit that information in the brain is represented in discrete form. We address this hypothesis using 2 approaches. First, we identify the fundamental communication requirements of the brain. Second, we estimate the symbol error probability and channel capacity for a continuous information representation. Our work concludes that information cannot be communicated and represented reliably in the brain using a continuous representation - it has to be in a discrete form. This is a major demarcation from conventional and current wisdom. We apply this discrete result to the 4 major neural coding hypotheses, and illustrate the use of discrete ISI neural coding in analyzing electrophysiology experimental data. We further posit and illustrate a plausible direct link between Weber's Law and discrete neural coding. We end by outlining a number of key research questions on discrete neural coding.