Researcher profile

Jakub W. Both

Jakub W. Both contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

An adaptive solution strategy for Richards' equation

Flow in variably saturated porous media is typically modelled by the Richards equation, a nonlinear elliptic-parabolic equation which is notoriously challenging to solve numerically. In this paper, we propose a robust and fast iterative solver for Richards' equation. The solver relies on an adaptive switching algorithm, based on rigorously derived a posteriori indicators, between two linearization methods: L-scheme and Newton. Although a combined L-scheme/Newton strategy was introduced previously in [List & Radu (2016)], here, for the first time we propose a reliable and robust criteria for switching between these schemes. The performance of the solver, which can be in principle applied to any spatial discretization and linearization methods, is illustrated through several numerical examples.

preprint2023arXiv

Physical variability in meter-scale laboratory CO$_2$ injections in faulted geometries

Carbon, capture, and storage (CCS) is an important bridging technology to combat climate change in the transition towards net-zero. The FluidFlower concept has been developed to visualize and study CO$_2$ flow and storage mechanisms in sedimentary systems in a laboratory setting. Meter-scale multiphase flow in two geological geometries, including normal faults with and without smearing, is studied. The experimental protocols developed to provide key input parameters for numerical simulations are detailed, including an evaluation of operational parameters for the FluidFlower benchmark study. Variability in CO$_2$ migration patterns for two different geometries is quantified, both between 16 repeated laboratory runs and between history-matched models and a CO$_2$ injection experiment. The predicative capability of a history-matched model is then evaluated in a different geological setting.

preprint2023arXiv

Room-scale CO2 injections in a physical reservoir model with faults

We perform a series of repeated CO2 injections in a room-scale physical model of a faulted geological cross-section. Relevant parameters for subsurface carbon sequestration, including multiphase flows, capillary CO2 trapping, dissolution, and convective mixing, are studied and quantified. As part of a forecasting benchmark study, we address and quantify six predefined metrics for storage capacity and security in typical CO2 storage operations. Using the same geometry, we investigate the degree of reproducibility of five repeated experimental runs. Our analysis focuses on physical variations of the spatial distribution of mobile and dissolved CO2, multiphase flow patterns, development in mass of the aqueous and gaseous phases, gravitational fingers, and leakage dynamics. We observe very good reproducibility in homogenous regions with up to 97 % overlap between repeated runs, and that fault-related heterogeneity tends to decrease reproducibility. Notably, we observe an oscillating anticline CO2 leakage behavior from an open anticline with a spill point in the immediate footwall of a normal fault, and discuss the underlying causes for the observed phenomenon within the constraints of the studied system.