Source author record

Jakkepalli Pavan Kumar

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

4works
3topics
2close collaborators

Published work

4 publications

preprint2020arXiv

Algorithmic Aspects of Secure Connected Domination in Graphs

Let G=(V,E)G = (V,E) be a simple, undirected and connected graph. A connected dominating set S⊆VS \subseteq V is a secure connected dominating set of GG, if for each u∈V∖S u \in V\setminus S, there exists v∈Sv\in S such that (u,v)∈E(u,v) \in E and the set (S∖{v})∪{u}(S \setminus \{ v \}) \cup \{ u \} is a connected dominating set of GG. The minimum size of a secure connected dominating set of GG denoted by γsc(G) γ_{sc} (G), is called the secure connected domination number of GG. Given a graph G G and a positive integer k, k, the Secure Connected Domination (SCDM) problem is to check whether G G has a secure connected dominating set of size at most k. k. In this paper, we prove that the SCDM problem is NP-complete for doubly chordal graphs, a subclass of chordal graphs. We investigate the complexity of this problem for some subclasses of bipartite graphs namely, star convex bipartite, comb convex bipartite, chordal bipartite and chain graphs. The Minimum Secure Connected Dominating Set (MSCDS) problem is to find a secure connected dominating set of minimum size in the input graph. We propose a (Δ(G)+1) (Δ(G)+1) - approximation algorithm for MSCDS, where Δ(G) Δ(G) is the maximum degree of the input graph G G and prove that MSCDS cannot be approximated within (1−ε)ln(∣V∣) (1 -ε) ln(| V |) for any ε>0 ε> 0 unless NP⊆DTIME(∣V∣O(loglog∣V∣)) NP \subseteq DTIME(| V |^{O(log log | V |)}) even for bipartite graphs. Finally, we show that the MSCDS is APX-complete for graphs with Δ(G)=4Δ(G)=4.

preprint2020arXiv

Algorithmic Aspects of Some Variants of Domination in Graphs

A set S⊆VS \subseteq V is a dominating set in G if for every u \in V \ S, there exists v∈Sv \in S such that (u,v)∈E(u,v) \in E, i.e., N[S]=VN[S] = V. A dominating set SS is an Isolate Dominating Set} (IDS) if the induced subgraph G[S]G[S] has at least one isolated vertex. It is known that Isolate Domination Decision problem (IDOM) is NP-complete for bipartite graphs. In this paper, we extend this by showing that the IDOM is NP-complete for split graphs and perfect elimination bipartite graphs, a subclass of bipartite graphs. A set S⊆VS \subseteq V is an independent set if G[S] has no edge. A set S \subseteq V is a secure dominating set of GG if, for each vertex u∈V∖Su \in V \setminus S, there exists a vertex v∈Sv \in S such that (u,v)∈E (u,v) \in E and (S {v})∪{u}(S \ \{v\}) \cup \{u\} is a dominating set of GG. In addition, we initiate the study of a new domination parameter called, independent secure domination. A set S⊆VS\subseteq V is an Independent Secure Dominating Set (InSDS) if SS is an independent set and a secure dominating set of GG. The minimum size of an InSDS in GG is called the independent secure domination number of GG and is denoted by γis(G)γ_{is}(G). Given a graph G G and a positive integer k, k, the InSDM problem is to check whether G G has an independent secure dominating set of size at most k. k. We prove that InSDM is NP-complete for bipartite graphs and linear time solvable for bounded tree-width graphs and threshold graphs, a subclass of split graphs. The MInSDS problem is to find an independent secure dominating set of minimum size, in the input graph. Finally, we prove that the MInSDS problem is APX-hard for graphs with maximum degree 5.5.

preprint2020arXiv

Algorithmic Complexity of Isolate Secure Domination in Graphs

A dominating set SS is an Isolate Dominating Set (IDS) if the induced subgraph G[S]G[S] has at least one isolated vertex. In this paper, we initiate the study of new domination parameter called, isolate secure domination. An isolate dominating set S⊆VS\subseteq V is an isolate secure dominating set (ISDS), if for each vertex u∈V∖Su \in V \setminus S, there exists a neighboring vertex vv of uu in SS such that (S∖{v})∪{u}(S \setminus \{v\}) \cup \{u\} is an IDS of GG. The minimum cardinality of an ISDS of GG is called as an isolate secure domination number, and is denoted by γ0s(G)γ_{0s}(G). Given a graph G=(V,E) G=(V,E) and a positive integer k, k, the ISDM problem is to check whether G G has an isolate secure dominating set of size at most k. k. We prove that ISDM is NP-complete even when restricted to bipartite graphs and split graphs. We also show that ISDM can be solved in linear time for graphs of bounded tree-width.

preprint2020arXiv

Algorithmic Complexity of Secure Connected Domination in Graphs

Let G=(V,E)G = (V,E) be a simple, undirected and connected graph. A connected (total) dominating set S⊆VS \subseteq V is a secure connected (total) dominating set of GG, if for each u∈V∖S u \in V \setminus S, there exists v∈Sv \in S such that uv∈Euv \in E and (S∖{v})∪{u}(S \setminus \lbrace v \rbrace) \cup \lbrace u \rbrace is a connected (total) dominating set of GG. The minimum cardinality of a secure connected (total) dominating set of GG denoted by γsc(G)(γst(G)) γ_{sc} (G) (γ_{st}(G)), is called the secure connected (total) domination number of GG. In this paper, we show that the decision problems corresponding to secure connected domination number and secure total domination number are NP-complete even when restricted to split graphs or bipartite graphs. The NP-complete reductions also show that these problems are w[2]-hard. We also prove that the secure connected domination problem is linear time solvable in block graphs and threshold graphs.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.