Researcher profile

Jaideep Ray

Jaideep Ray contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

math.NA physics.data-an physics.soc-ph Populations and Evolution Quantitative Methods Social and Information Networks

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - Baseline

3works

0followers

6topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2020arXiv

Daily Forecasting of New Cases for Regional Epidemics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 with Bayesian Uncertainty Quantification

To increase situational awareness and support evidence-based policy-making, we formulated two types of mathematical models for COVID-19 transmission within a regional population. One is a fitting function that can be calibrated to reproduce an epidemic curve with two timescales (e.g., fast growth and slow decay). The other is a compartmental model that accounts for quarantine, self-isolation, social distancing, a non-exponentially distributed incubation period, asymptomatic individuals, and mild and severe forms of symptomatic disease. Using Bayesian inference, we have been calibrating our models daily for consistency with new reports of confirmed cases from the 15 most populous metropolitan statistical areas in the United States and quantifying uncertainty in parameter estimates and predictions of future case reports. This online learning approach allows for early identification of new trends despite considerable variability in case reporting. We infer new significant upward trends for five of the metropolitan areas starting between 19-April-2020 and 12-June-2020.

preprint2014arXiv

Decreasing the temporal complexity for nonlinear, implicit reduced-order models by forecasting

Implicit numerical integration of nonlinear ODEs requires solving a system of nonlinear algebraic equations at each time step. Each of these systems is often solved by a Newton-like method, which incurs a sequence of linear-system solves. Most model-reduction techniques for nonlinear ODEs exploit knowledge of system's spatial behavior to reduce the computational complexity of each linear-system solve. However, the number of linear-system solves for the reduced-order simulation often remains roughly the same as that for the full-order simulation. We propose exploiting knowledge of the model's temporal behavior to 1) forecast the unknown variable of the reduced-order system of nonlinear equations at future time steps, and 2) use this forecast as an initial guess for the Newton-like solver during the reduced-order-model simulation. To compute the forecast, we propose using the Gappy POD technique. The goal is to generate an a ccurate initial guess so that the Newton solver requires many fewer iterations to converge, thereby decreasing the number of lin ear-system solves in the reduced-order-model simulation.

preprint2012arXiv

Are we there yet? When to stop a Markov chain while generating random graphs

Markov chains are a convenient means of generating realizations of networks, since they require little more than a procedure for rewiring edges. If a rewiring procedure exists for generating new graphs with specified statistical properties, then a Markov chain sampler can generate an ensemble of graphs with prescribed characteristics. However, successive graphs in a Markov chain cannot be used when one desires independent draws from the distribution of graphs; the realizations are correlated. Consequently, one runs a Markov chain for N iterations before accepting the realization as an independent sample. In this work, we devise two methods for calculating N. They are both based on the binary "time-series" denoting the occurrence/non-occurrence of edge (u, v) between vertices u and v in the Markov chain of graphs generated by the sampler. They differ in their underlying assumptions. We test them on the generation of graphs with a prescribed joint degree distribution. We find the N proportional |E|, where |E| is the number of edges in the graph. The two methods are compared by sampling on real, sparse graphs with 10^3 - 10^4 vertices.