Researcher profile

Jagmohan Singh

Jagmohan Singh contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 11 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
1works
0followers
1topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2025arXiv

Effect of cross-sectional anisotropy on shock train dynamics in supersonic internal flows

This study investigates the effect of duct aspect ratio ($AR$), defined as the ratio of major to minor axis in an elliptical duct, on shock train dynamics for a freestream Mach number of 2.1. The aspect ratio $AR$ is varied from 1.0 to 3.0 while maintaining a constant cross-sectional area and identical upstream conditions, thereby ensuring the same inlet mass flow and nearly constant boundary-layer-induced blockage across all $AR$. This isolates shape-induced confinement effects. Simulations are performed using an embedded-boundary method with adaptive mesh refinement which enabled a finest resolution of 48$μ$m resolving the shocks in the shock train. The results show that increasing $AR$ significantly modifies the shock train morphology. The number of discrete shock cells decreases, and the leading shock front elongates along the major axis while contracting along the minor axis. The normal shock stem prominent in the circular duct (AR=1.0) nearly disappears at AR=3.0. Despite these morphological changes, the wall-pressure trace and stagnation-pressure loss remain largely insensitive to $AR$. These results indicate that while duct cross-section governs the detailed shock train structure, the overall efficiency of flow deceleration and pressure recovery is dictated primarily by the effective blockage imposed by the turbulent boundary layer, rather than the aspect ratio itself for a given mass flow rate and pressure ratio across the pseudo shock.