BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Jaeha Lee

Jaeha Lee appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
quant-ph

Catalog footprint

What is connected

8works
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

8 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A Universal Formulation of Uncertainty Relation for Error-Disturbance and Local Representability of Quantum Observables

A universal formulation of the quantum uncertainty regarding quantum indeterminacy, quantum measurement, and its inevitable observer effect is presented with additional focus on the representability of quantum observables over a given state. The operational tangibility of the framework assures that the resultant general relations admit natural operational interpretations and characterisations, and thereby perhaps most importantly, their experimental verifiability. In view of the universal formulation, Heisenberg's original philosophy of the uncertainty principle, most typically exemplified in his famous gamma-ray microscope Gedankenexperiment, is revisited; it is reformulated and restated as a refined no-go theorem, albeit perhaps in a weaker form than was originally intended. The relations entail, in essence as corollaries to their special cases, several previously known relations, including most notably the standard Kennard-Robertson relation, the Arthurs-Kelly-Goodman relations for joint measurement as well as the Ozawa and the Watanabe-Sagawa-Ueda relations for error and error-disturbance.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

A Universal Formulation of Uncertainty Relation for Errors under Local Representability

A universal formulation of uncertainty relations for quantum measurements is presented with additional focus on the representability of quantum observables by classical observables over a given state. Owing to the simplicity and operational tangibility of the framework, the resultant general relations admit natural operational interpretations and characterisations, and are thus also experimentally verifiable. In view of the universal formulation, Heisenberg's philosophy of the uncertainty principle is also revisited; it is reformulated and restated as a refined no-go theorem, albeit perhaps in a weaker form than was originally intended. In fact, the relations entail, in essence as corollaries to their special cases, several previously known relations, including most notably the Arthurs-Kelly-Goodman, Ozawa, and Watanabe-Sagawa-Ueda relations for quantum measurements. The Schr{ö}dinger relation (hence the standard Kennard-Robertson relation as its trivial corollary as well) is also shown to be a special case when the measurement is non-informative.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Geometric Formulation of Universally Valid Uncertainty Relation for Error

We present a new geometric formulation of uncertainty relation valid for any quantum measurements of statistical nature. Owing to its simplicity and tangibility, our relation is universally valid and experimentally viable. Although our relation violates the na{ï}ve non-commutativity bound $\hbar/2$ for the measurement of position and momentum, the spirit of the uncertainty principle still stands strong. Our relation entails, among others, the Ozawa relation as a corollary, and also reduces seamlessly to the standard Kennard-Robertson relation when the measurement is non-informative.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Uncertainty Relations of Variances in View of the Weak Value

The Schr{ö}dinger inequality is known to underlie the Kennard-Robertson inequality, which is the standard expression of quantum uncertainty for the product of variances of two observables $A$ and $B$, in the sense that the latter is derived from the former. In this paper we point out that, albeit more subtle, there is yet another inequality which underlies the Schr{ö}dinger inequality in the same sense. The key component of this observation is the use of the weak-value operator $A_{\rm w}(B)$ introduced in our previous works (named after Aharonov's weak value), which was shown to act as the proxy operator for $A$ when $B$ is measured. The lower bound of our novel inequality supplements that of the Schr{ö}dinger inequality by a term representing the discord between $A_{\rm w}(B)$ and $A$. In addition, the decomposition of the Schr{ö}dinger inequality, which was also obtained in our previous works by making use the weak-value operator, is examined more closely to analyze its structure and the minimal uncertainty states. Our results are exemplified with some elementary spin 1 and 3/2 models as well as the familiar case of $A$ and $B$ being the position and momentum of a particle.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Quasi-probabilities in Conditioned Quantum Measurement and a Geometric/Statistical Interpretation of Aharonov's Weak Value

We show that the joint behaviour of an arbitrary pair of quantum observables can be described by quasi-probabilities, which are extensions of the standard probabilities used for describing the behaviour of a single observable. The physical situations that require these quasi-probabilities arise when one considers quantum measurement of an observable conditioned by some other variable, with the notable example being the weak measurement employed to obtain Aharonov's weak value. Specifically, we present a general prescription for the construction of quasi-joint-probability (QJP) distributions associated with a given pair of observables. These QJP distributions are introduced in two complementary approaches: one from a bottom-up, strictly operational construction realised by examining the mathematical framework of the conditioned measurement scheme, and the other from a top-down viewpoint realised by applying the results of spectral theorem for normal operators and its Fourier transforms. It is then revealed that, for a pair of simultaneously measurable observables, the QJP distribution reduces to their unique standard joint-probability distribution, whereas for a non-commuting pair there exists an inherent indefiniteness in the choice, admitting a multitude of candidates that may equally be used for describing their joint behaviour. In the course of our argument, we find that the QJP distributions furnish the space of operators with their characteristic geometric structures such that the orthogonal projections and inner products of observables can, respectively, be given statistical interpretations as `conditionings' and `correlations'. The weak value $A_{w}$ for an observable $A$ is then given a geometric/statistical interpretation as either the orthogonal projection of $A$ onto the subspace generated by another observable $B$, or equivalently, as the conditioning of $A$ given $B$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Uncertainty Relations for Approximation and Estimation

We present a versatile inequality of uncertainty relations which are useful when one approximates an observable and/or estimates a physical parameter based on the measurement of another observable. It is shown that the optimal choice for proxy functions used for the approximation is given by Aharonov's weak value, which also determines the classical Fisher information in parameter estimation, turning our inequality into the genuine Cram{é}r-Rao inequality. Since the standard form of the uncertainty relation arises as a special case of our inequality, and since the parameter estimation is available as well, our inequality can treat both the position-momentum and the time-energy relations in one framework albeit handled differently.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Weak Value, Quasiprobability and Bohmian Mechanics

We clarify the significance of quasiprobability (QP) in quantum mechanics that is relevant in describing physical quantities associated with a transition process. Our basic quantity is Aharonov's weak value, from which the QP can be defined up to a certain ambiguity parameterized by a complex number. Unlike the conventional probability, the QP allows us to treat two noncommuting observables consistently, and this is utilized to embed the QP in Bohmian mechanics such that its equivalence to quantum mechanics becomes more transparent. We also show that, with the help of the QP, Bohmian mechanics can be recognized as an ontological model with a certain type of contextuality.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Uncertainty of Weak Measurement and Merit of Amplification

Aharonov's weak value, which is a physical quantity obtainable by weak measurement, admits amplification and hence is deemed to be useful for precision measurement. We examine the significance of the amplification based on the uncertainty of measurement, and show that the trade-offs among the three (systematic, statistical and nonlinear) components of the uncertainty inherent in the weak measurement will set an upper limit on the usable amplification. Apart from the Gaussian state models employed for demonstration, our argument is completely general; it is free from approximation and valid for arbitrary observables $A$ and couplings $g$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access