BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Jadson Santos

Jadson Santos contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Software Engineering

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Investigating the Impact of Continuous Integration Practices on the Productivity and Quality of Open-Source Projects

Background: Much research has been conducted to investigate the impact of Continuous Integration (CI) on the productivity and quality of open-source projects. Most of studies have analyzed the impact of adopting a CI server service (e.g, Travis-CI) but did not analyze CI sub-practices. Aims: We aim to evaluate the impact of five CI sub-practices with respect to the productivity and quality of GitHub open-source projects. Method: We collect CI sub-practices of 90 relevant open-source projects for a period of 2 years. We use regression models to analyze whether projects upholding the CI sub-practices are more productive and/or generate fewer bugs. We also perform a qualitative document analysis to understand whether CI best practices are related to a higher quality of projects. Results: Our findings reveal a correlation between the Build Activity and Commit Activity sub-practices and the number of merged pull requests. We also observe a correlation between the Build Activity, Build Health and Time to Fix Broken Builds sub-practices and number of bug-related issues. The qualitative analysis reveals that projects with the best values for CI sub-practices face fewer CI-related problems compared to projects that exhibit the worst values for CI sub-practices. Conclusions: We recommend that projects should strive to uphold the several CI sub-practices as they can impact in the productivity and quality of projects.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

The Effects of Continuous Integration on Software Development: a Systematic Literature Review

Context: Continuous integration (CI) is a software engineering technique that proclaims a set of frequent activities to assure the health of the software product. Researchers and practitioners mention several benefits related to CI. However, no systematic study surveys state of the art regarding such benefits or cons. Objective: This study aims to identify and interpret empirical evidence regarding how CI impacts software development. Method: Through a Systematic Literature Review, we search for studies in six digital libraries. Starting from 479 studies, we select 101 empirical studies that evaluate CI for any software development activity (e.g., testing). We thoroughly read and extract information regarding (i) CI environment, (ii) findings related to effects of CI, and (iii) the employed methodology. We apply a thematic synthesis to group and summarize the findings. Results: Existing research has explored the positive effects of CI, such as better cooperation, or negative effects, such as adding technical and process challenges. From our thematic synthesis, we identify six themes: development activities, software process, quality assurance, integration patterns, issues & defects, and build patterns. Conclusions: Empirical research in CI has been increasing over recent years. We found that much of the existing research reveals that CI brings positive effects to the software development phenomena. However, CI may also bring technical challenges to software development teams. Despite the overall positive outlook regarding CI, we still find room for improvements in the existing empirical research that evaluates the effects of CI.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access