BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

J. Wudka

J. Wudka contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
hep-ph

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2019arXiv

Strongly Interacting Neutrino Portal Dark Matter

We present a realistic, simple and natural model of strongly-interacting dark matter based on the neutrino-portal paradigm. The strong interactions at small velocities are generated by the exchange of dark photons, and produce the observed core-like DM distribution in galactic centers; this effect could be spoiled by the formation of DM bound states (also due to dark-photon effects), which we avoid by requiring the DM candidates to be light, with masses below O(10 GeV). The mixing of the dark photon with the Z and ordinary photon is strongly suppressed by introducing a softly-broken discrete symmetry similar to charge conjugation, which also ensures that the dark photon life-time is short enough to avoid restrictions derived form big-bang nucleosynthesis and large-scale structure formation. Other constraints are accommodated without the need of fine tuning, in particular nucleon scattering occurs only at one loop, so direct detection cross sections are naturally suppressed. Neutrino masses are generated through the inverse see saw.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Neutrinoless double $β$ decay with small neutrino masses

If the only contribution to neutrinoless double beta decay (NLDBD) are neutrino masses its discovery may be very difficult, especially if neutrinos present a normal hierarchy spectrum. However, this is not the only possibility; NLDBD can in general produce electrons of either chirality, in contrast with the neutrino induced NLDBD which predicts two left-handed electrons. Using an effective Lagrangian approach we classify the lepton number violating (LNV) effective operators with two leptons of either chirality but no quarks, ordered according to the magnitude of their contribution to NLDBD. We point out that, for each of the three chirality assignments, $e_{L}e_{L},e_{L}e_{R}$ and $e_{R}e_{R}$, there is only one LNV operator of the corresponding type to lowest order, and these have dimensions 5, 7 and 9, respectively. Neutrino masses are always induced by these extra operators but can be delayed to one (dimension 7) or two loops (dimension 9). Under the assumption that NLDBD is dominated by the operators of dimension 7 or 9 we find that the scale of new physics should be relatively low ($\lesssim 30$ TeV). We also list the SM additions generating these operators upon integration of the heavy modes, and discuss simple realistic examples of renormalizable theories for each case. The phenomenology of a model giving rise to the dimension 9 operator has been analyzed with some detail: if NLDBD is going to be seen in the next round of experiments, the doubly charged scalars of the model could be seen at the LHC and lepton flavour violating (LFV) rates could be at the reach of foreseen experiments. Moreover neutrino masses, which arise at two loops, display a very particular structure and are strongly constrained, in fact, $\sin^{2}θ_{13}\gtrsim0.008$, when $μ\rightarrow eee$ is required to lie below its present experimental limit.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2002arXiv

Present and Future Electroweak Precision Measurements and the Indirect Determination of the Mass of the Higgs Boson

We discuss the experimental and theoretical uncertainties on precision electroweak observables and their relationship to the indirect constraints on the Higgs-boson mass, $\MH$, in the Standard Model (SM). The critical experimental measurements ($\MW$, $\sweff$, $\mt$, ...) are evaluated in terms of their present uncertainties and their prospects for improved precision at future colliders, and their contribution to the constraints on $\MH$. In addition, the current uncertainties of the theoretical predictions for $\MW$ and $\sweff$ due to missing higher order corrections are estimated and expectations and necessary theoretical improvements for future colliders are explored. The constraints from rare B decays are also discussed. Analysis of the present experimental and theoretical precisions yield a current upper bound on $\MH$ of $\sim 200$ GeV. Including anticipated improvements corresponding to the prospective situation at future colliders (Tevatron Run II, LHC, LC/GigaZ), we find a relative precision of about 25% to 8% (or better) is achievable in the indirect determination of $\MH$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access