Source author record

J. Mirkovic

J. Mirkovic appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.soft

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works

3topics

3close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2001arXiv

Anisotropy of Vortex-Liquid and Vortex-Solid Phases in Single Crystals of Bi$_2$Sr$_2$CaCu$_2$O$_{8+δ}$: Violation of the Scaling Law

The vortex-liquid and vortex-solid phases in single crystals of Bi$_2$Sr$_2$CaCu$_2$O$_{8+δ}$ placed in tilted magnetic fields are studied by in-plane resistivity measurements using the Corbino geometry to avoid spurious surface barrier effects. It was found that the anisotropy of the vortex-solid phase increases with temperature and exhibits a maximum at $T\approx 0.97 T_c$. In contrast, the anisotropy of the vortex-liquid rises monotonically across the whole measured temperature range. The observed behavior is discussed in the context of dimensional crossover and thermal fluctuations of vortices in the strongly layered system.

preprint2001arXiv

The London theory of the crossing-vortex lattice in highly anisotropic layered superconductors

A novel description of Josephson vortices (JVs) crossed by the pancake vortices (PVs) is proposed on the basis of the anisotropic London theory. The field distribution of a JV and its energy have been calculated for both dense ($a<λ_J$) and dilute ($a>λ_J$) PV lattices with distance $a$ between PVs, and the nonlinear JV core size $λ_J$. It is shown that the ``shifted'' PV lattice (PVs displaced mainly along JVs in the crossing vortex lattice structure), formed in high out-of-plane magnetic fields transforms into the PV lattice ``trapped'' by the JV sublattice at a certain field, lower than $Φ_0/γ^2s^2$, where $Φ_0$ is the flux quantum, $γ$ is the anisotropy parameter and $s$ is the distance between CuO$_2$ planes. With further decreasing $B_z$, the free energy of the crossing vortex lattice structure (PV and JV sublattices coexist separately) can exceed the free energy of the tilted lattice (common PV-JV vortex structure) in the case of $γs<λ_{ab}$ with the in-plane penetration depth $λ_{ab}$ if the low ($B_x<γΦ_0/λ_{ab}^2$) or high ($B_x\gtrsim Φ_0/γs^2$) in-plane magnetic field is applied. It means that the crossing vortex structure is realized in the intermediate field orientations, while the tilted vortex lattice can exist if the magnetic field is aligned near the $c$-axis and the $ab$-plane as well. In the intermediate in-plane fields $γΦ_0/λ_{ab}^2\lesssim B_x \lesssim Φ_0/γs^2$, the crossing vortex structure with the ``trapped'' PV sublattice seems to settle in until the lock-in transition occurs since this structure has the lower energy with respect to the tilted vortex structure in the magnetic field ${\vec H}$ oriented near the $ab$-plane.

Institution

Affiliation not imported yet

This author record came from a source that does not expose affiliation metadata. Once the author claims the profile or we enrich the record from another provider, this section will link to the concrete institution.

Topic footprint