BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

J. Chýla

J. Chýla appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
hep-ph

Catalog footprint

What is connected

5works
1topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint1994arXiv

What does the CCFR measurement of the Gross--Llewelyn Smith sum rule tell us?

Recently the CCFR Collaboration reported the measurement of the Gross--Llewellyn Smith sum rule %at $Q^2=3\; \mr{GeV}^2$: $\int^{1}_{0}\mr{d}F_{3}^{νp+\bareνp}(x,Q^2=3\;\mr{GeV}^2)= 2.50\pm 0.018(\mr{stat})$. Subsequently Kataev and Sidorov analyzed the $Q^2$--dependence of this sum rule and pointed out a discrepancy between the results obtained via integration of the NLO fits to $xF_{3}(x,Q^2)$ and the purely perturbative prediction. We suggest an explanation of this disagreement and show that the result of the CCFR measurement of the GLS sum rule integral can be determined from the knowledge of the value of $Λ_{\bbare{MS}}$ only.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint1993arXiv

Direct vs. resolved photon: an exercise in factorization

Direct and resolved photon interactions are shown to be intimately related through the factorization mechanism. It is argued that in theoretically consistent analysis of jet production in $γ$p and ep collisions the LO resolved $γ$ contribution must be considered together with the NLO direct $γ$ component. Recent data from HERA therefore do not provide a direct evidence for the former component, but should rather be interpreted as a manifestation of the $O(αα_s^2)$ term in $γ$p and, via the Weizsäcker-Williams approximation, in ep interactions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint1993arXiv

On parton distributions beyond the leading order

The importance of properly taking into account the factorization scheme dependence of parton distribution functions is emphasized. A serious error in the usual handling of this topic is pointed out and the correct procedure for transforming parton distribution functions from one factorisation scheme to another recalled. It is shown that the conventional $\overline{\rm {MS}}$ and DIS definitions thereof are ill-defined due to the lack of distinction between the factorisation scheme dependence of parton distribution functions and renormalisation scheme dependence of the strong coupling constant $α_s$. A novel definition of parton distribution functions is suggested and its role in the construction of consistent next-to-leading order event generators briefly outlined.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint1993arXiv

Strong renormalization scheme dependence in $τ$-lepton decays: fact or fiction?

The question of the renormalization scheme dependence of the $τ$ semileptonic decay rate is revisited in response to a recent criticism. Particular attention is payed to a distinction between a consistent quantitative description of this dependence and the actual selection of a subset of ``acceptable'' renormalization schemes. It is argued that a reasonable universal measure of the renormalization scheme dependence can be formulated, which gives encouraging results when applied to various physical quantities, including the semileptonic $τ$ decay rate.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint1992arXiv

On an asymptotic estimate of the $n$-loop correction in perturbative QCD

A recently proposed method of estimating the asymptotic behaviour of QCD perturbation theory coefficients is critically reviewed and shown to contain numerous invalid mathematical operations and unsubstantiated assumptions. We discuss in detail why this procedure, based solely on renormalization group (RG) considerations and analyticity constraints, cannot lead to such estimates. We stress the importance of correct renormalization scheme (RS) dependence of any meaningful asymptotic estimate and argue that the unambiguous summation of QCD perturbation expansions for physical quantities requires information from outside of perturbation theory itself.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access