BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

J. Andrew Royle

J. Andrew Royle appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
ApplicationsMethodologyQuantitative Methodsstat.OT

Catalog footprint

What is connected

5works
4topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2015arXiv

Spatial Capture-recapture with Partial Identity

We develop an inference framework for spatial capture-recapture data when two methods are used in which individuality cannot generally be reconciled between the two methods. A special case occurs in camera trapping when left-side (method 1) and right-side (method 2) photos are obtained but not simultaneously. We specify a spatially explicit capture-recapture model for the latent "perfect" data set which is conditioned on known identity of individuals between methods. We regard the identity variable which associates individuals of the two data sets as an unknown in the model and we propose a Bayesian analysis strategy for the model in which the identity variable is updated using a Metropolis component algorithm. The work extends previous efforts to deal with incomplete data by recognizing that there is information about individuality in the spatial juxtaposition of captures. Thus, individual records obtained by both sampling methods that are in close proximity are more likely to be the same individual than individuals that are not in close proximity. The model proposed here formalizes this trade-off between spatial proximity and probabilistic determination of individuality using spatially explicit capture-recapture models.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Spatially explicit models for inference about density in unmarked or partially marked populations

Recently developed spatial capture-recapture (SCR) models represent a major advance over traditional capture-recapture (CR) models because they yield explicit estimates of animal density instead of population size within an unknown area. Furthermore, unlike nonspatial CR methods, SCR models account for heterogeneity in capture probability arising from the juxtaposition of animal activity centers and sample locations. Although the utility of SCR methods is gaining recognition, the requirement that all individuals can be uniquely identified excludes their use in many contexts. In this paper, we develop models for situations in which individual recognition is not possible, thereby allowing SCR concepts to be applied in studies of unmarked or partially marked populations. The data required for our model are spatially referenced counts made on one or more sample occasions at a collection of closely spaced sample units such that individuals can be encountered at multiple locations. Our approach includes a spatial point process for the animal activity centers and uses the spatial correlation in counts as information about the number and location of the activity centers. Camera-traps, hair snares, track plates, sound recordings, and even point counts can yield spatially correlated count data, and thus our model is widely applicable. A simulation study demonstrated that while the posterior mean exhibits frequentist bias on the order of 5-10% in small samples, the posterior mode is an accurate point estimator as long as adequate spatial correlation is present. Marking a subset of the population substantially increases posterior precision and is recommended whenever possible. We applied our model to avian point count data collected on an unmarked population of the northern parula (Parula americana) and obtained a density estimate (posterior mode) of 0.38 (95% CI: 0.19-1.64) birds/ha. Our paper challenges sampling and analytical conventions in ecology by demonstrating that neither spatial independence nor individual recognition is needed to estimate population density - rather, spatial dependence can be informative about individual distribution and density.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Data Augmentation for Hierarchical Capture-recapture Models

Capture-recapture studies are widely used to obtain information about abundance (population size or density) of animal populations. A common design is that in which multiple distinct populations are sampled, and the research objective is modeling variation in population size $N_{s}; s=1,2,...,S$ among the populations such as estimating a treatment effect or some other source of variation related to landscape structure. The problem is naturally resolved using hierarchical models. We provide a Bayesian formulation of such models using data augmentation which preserves the individual encounter histories in the model and, as such, is amenable to modeling individual effects. We formulate the model by conditioning on the total population size among all populations. In this case, the abundance model can be formulated as a multinomial model that allocates individuals among sites. MCMC is easily carried out by the introduction of a categorical individual effect, $g_{i}$, which partitions the total population size. The prior distribution for the latent variable $g$ is derived from the model assumed for the population sizes $N_{s}$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Integrating Resource Selection Information with Spatial Capture-Recapture

Understanding space usage and resource selection is a primary focus of many studies of animal populations. Usually, such studies are based on location data obtained from telemetry, and resource selection functions (RSF) are used for inference. Another important focus of wildlife research is estimation and modeling population size and density. Recently developed spatial capture-recapture (SCR) models accomplish this objective using individual encounter history data with auxiliary spatial information on location of capture. SCR models include encounter probability functions that are intuitively related to RSFs, but to date, no one has extended SCR models to allow for explicit inference about space usage and resource selection. We develop a statistical framework for jointly modeling space usage, resource selection, and population density by integrating SCR data, such as from camera traps, mist-nets, or conventional catch-traps, with resource selection data from telemetered individuals. We provide a framework for estimation based on marginal likelihood, wherein we estimate simultaneously the parameters of the SCR and RSF models. Our method leads to increases in precision for estimating population density and parameters of ordinary SCR models. Importantly, we also find that SCR models alone can estimate parameters of resource selection functions and, as such, SCR methods can be used as the sole source for studying space-usage; however, precision will be higher when telemetry data are available. Finally, we find that SCR models using standard symmetric and stationary encounter probability models produce biased estimates of density when animal space usage is related to a landscape covariate. Therefore, it is important that space usage be taken into consideration, if possible, in studies focused on estimating density using capture-recapture methods.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access