BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Isaac Grosof

Isaac Grosof contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
PerformanceComputer Science and Game TheoryData Structures and Algorithms

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Incentive Compatible Queues Without Money

For job scheduling systems, where jobs require some amount of processing and then leave the system, it is natural for each user to provide an estimate of their job's time requirement in order to aid the scheduler. However, if there is no incentive mechanism for truthfulness, each user will be motivated to provide estimates that give their job precedence in the schedule, so that the job completes as early as possible. We examine how to make such scheduling systems incentive compatible, without using monetary charges, under a natural queueing theory framework. In our setup, each user has an estimate of their job's running time, but it is possible for this estimate to be incorrect. We examine scheduling policies where if a job exceeds its estimate, it is with some probability "punished" and re-scheduled after other jobs, to disincentivize underestimates of job times. However, because user estimates may be incorrect (without any malicious intent), excessive punishment may incentivize users to overestimate their job times, which leads to less efficient scheduling. We describe two natural scheduling policies, BlindTrust and MeasuredTrust. We show that, for both of these policies, given the parameters of the system, we can efficiently determine the set of punishment probabilities that are incentive compatible, in that users are incentivized to provide their actual estimate of the job time. Moreover, we prove for MeasuredTrust that in the limit as estimates converge to perfect accuracy, the range of punishment probabilities that are incentive compatible converges to $[0,1]$. Our formalism establishes a framework for studying further queue-based scheduling problems where job time estimates from users are utilized, and the system needs to incentivize truthful reporting of estimates.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Uniform Bounds for Scheduling with Job Size Estimates

We consider the problem of scheduling to minimize mean response time in M/G/1 queues where only estimated job sizes (processing times) are known to the scheduler, where a job of true size $s$ has estimated size in the interval $[βs, αs]$ for some $α\geq β> 0$. We evaluate each scheduling policy by its approximation ratio, which we define to be the ratio between its mean response time and that of Shortest Remaining Processing Time (SRPT), the optimal policy when true sizes are known. Our question: is there a scheduling policy that (a) has approximation ratio near 1 when $α$ and $β$ are near 1, (b) has approximation ratio bounded by some function of $α$ and $β$ even when they are far from 1, and (c) can be implemented without knowledge of $α$ and $β$? We first show that naively running SRPT using estimated sizes in place of true sizes is not such a policy: its approximation ratio can be arbitrarily large for any fixed $β< 1$. We then provide a simple variant of SRPT for estimated sizes that satisfies criteria (a), (b), and (c). In particular, we prove its approximation ratio approaches 1 uniformly as $α$ and $β$ approach 1. This is the first result showing this type of convergence for M/G/1 scheduling. We also study the Preemptive Shortest Job First (PSJF) policy, a cousin of SRPT. We show that, unlike SRPT, naively running PSJF using estimated sizes in place of true sizes satisfies criteria (b) and (c), as well as a weaker version of (a).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

WCFS: A new framework for analyzing multiserver systems

Multiserver queueing systems are found at the core of a wide variety of practical systems. Many important multiserver models have a previously-unexplained similarity: identical mean response time behavior is empirically observed in the heavy traffic limit. We explain this similarity for the first time. We do so by introducing the work-conserving finite-skip (WCFS) framework, which encompasses a broad class of important models. This class includes the heterogeneous M/G/k, the limited processor sharing policy for the M/G/1, the threshold parallelism model, and the multiserver-job model under a novel scheduling algorithm. We prove that for all WCFS models, scaled mean response time $E[T](1-ρ)$ converges to the same value, $E[S^2]/(2E[S])$, in the heavy-traffic limit, which is also the heavy traffic limit for the M/G/1/FCFS. Moreover, we prove additively tight bounds on mean response time for the WCFS class, which hold for all load $ρ$. For each of the four models mentioned above, our bounds are the first known bounds on mean response time.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access