BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Irina A. Kogan

Irina A. Kogan appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Computer Visionmath.AGmath.DGComputational Geometrymath.AP

Catalog footprint

What is connected

4works
5topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2015arXiv

Invariants of objects and their images under surjective maps

We examine the relationships between the differential invariants of objects and of their images under a surjective map. We analyze both the case when the underlying transformation group is projectable and hence induces an action on the image, and the case when only a proper subgroup of the entire group acts projectably. In the former case, we establish a constructible isomorphism between the algebra of differential invariants of the images and the algebra of fiber-wise constant (gauge) differential invariants of the objects. In the latter case, we describe residual effects of the full transformation group on the image invariants. Our motivation comes from the problem of reconstruction of an object from multiple-view images, with central and parallel projections of curves from three-dimensional space to the two-dimensional plane serving as our main examples.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Object-image correspondence for curves under projections

We present a novel algorithm for deciding whether a given planar curve is an image of a given spatial curve, obtained by a central or a parallel projection with unknown parameters. A straightforward approach to this problem consists of setting up a system of conditions on the projection parameters and then checking whether or not this system has a solution. The main advantage of the algorithm presented here, in comparison to algorithms based on the straightforward approach, lies in a significant reduction of a number of real parameters that need to be eliminated in order to establish existence or non-existence of a projection that maps a given spatial curve to a given planar curve. Our algorithm is based on projection criteria that reduce the projection problem to a certain modification of the equivalence problem of planar curves under affine and projective transformations. The latter problem is then solved by differential signature construction based on Cartan's moving frame method. A similar approach can be used to decide whether a given finite set of ordered points on a plane is an image of a given finite set of ordered points in R^3. The motivation comes from the problem of establishing a correspondence between an object and an image, taken by a camera with unknown position and parameters.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Extensions for Systems of Conservation Laws

Extensions (entropies) play a central role in the theory of hyperbolic conservation laws by providing intrinsic selection criteria for weak solutions. For a given hyperbolic system u_t+f(u)_x=0, a standard approach is to analyze directly the second order PDE system for the extensions. Instead we find it advantageous to consider the equations satisfied by the lengths beta^i of the right eigenvectors r_i the Jacobian matrix Df, as measured with respect to the inner product defined by an extension. Our geometric formulation provides a natural and systematic approach to existence of extensions. By prescribing the eigen-fields r_i our results automatically apply to all systems with the same eigen-frame. The equations for the lengths beta^i form a first order algebraic-differential system (the beta-system) to which standard integrability theorems can be applied. The size of the set of extensions follows by determining the number of free constants and functions present in the general solution to the beta-system. We provide a complete breakdown of the various possibilities for systems of three equations, as well as for rich hyperbolic systems of any size.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Object-image correspondence for curves under finite and affine cameras

We provide criteria for deciding whether a given planar curve is an image of a given spatial curve, obtained by a central or a parallel projection with unknown parameters. These criteria reduce the projection problem to a certain modification of the equivalence problem of planar curves under affine and projective transformations. The latter problem can be addressed using Cartan's moving frame method. This leads to a novel algorithmic solution of the projection problem for curves. The computational advantage of the algorithms presented here, in comparison to algorithms based on a straightforward solution, lies in a significant reduction of a number of real parameters that has to be eliminated in order to establish existence or non-existence of a projection that maps a given spatial curve to a given planar curve. The same approach can be used to decide whether a given finite set of ordered points on a plane is an image of a given finite set of ordered points in R^3. The motivation comes from the problem of establishing a correspondence between an object and an image, taken by a camera with unknown position and parameters.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access