BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Immanuel Bomze

Immanuel Bomze contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.OC

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

The Maximum Clique Problem under Adversarial Uncertainty: a min-max approach

We analyze the problem of identifying large cliques in graphs that are affected by adversarial uncertainty. More specifically, we consider a new formulation, namely the adversarial maximum clique problem, which extends the classical maximum-clique problem to graphs with edges strategically perturbed by an adversary. The proposed mathematical model is thus formulated as a two-player zero-sum game between a clique seeker and an opposing agent. Inspired by regularized continuous reformulations of the maximum-clique problem, we derive a penalized continuous formulation leading to a nonconvex and nonsmooth optimization problem. We further introduce the notion of stable global solutions, namely points remaining optimal under small perturbations of the penalty parameters, and prove an equivalence between stable global solutions of the continuous reformulation and largest cliques that are common to all the adversarially perturbed graphs. In order to solve the given nonsmooth problem, we develop a first-order and projection-free algorithm based on generalized subdifferential calculus in the sense of Clarke and Goldstein, and establish global sublinear convergence rates for it. Finally, we report numerical experiments on benchmark instances showing that the proposed method efficiently detects large common cliques.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Uncertainty Preferences in Robust Mixed-Integer Linear Optimization with Endogenous Uncertainty

In robust optimization one seeks to make a decision under uncertainty, where the goal is to find the solution with the best worst-case performance. The set of possible realizations of the uncertain data is described by a so-called uncertainty set. In many scenarios, a decision maker may influence the uncertainty regime she is facing, for example, by investing in market research, or in machines which work with higher precision. Recently, this situation was addressed in the literature by introducing decision dependent uncertainty sets (endogenous uncertainty), i.e., uncertainty sets whose structure depends on (typically discrete) decision variables. In this way, one can model the trade-off between reducing the cost of robustness versus the cost of the investment necessary for influencing the uncertainty. However, there is another trade-off to be made here. With different uncertainty regimes, not only do the worst-case optimal solutions vary, but also other aspects of that solutions such as max-regret, best-case performance or predictability of the performance. A decision maker may still be interested in having a performance guarantee, but at the same time be willing to forgo superior worst-case performance if those other aspects can be enhanced by switching to a suitable uncertainty regime. We introduce the notion of uncertainty preference in order to capture such stances. We present three ways to formalize uncertainty preferences and study the resulting mathematical models. The goal is to have reformulations/approximations of these models which can be solved with standard methods. The workhorse is mixed-integer linear and conic optimization. We apply our framework to the uncertain shortest path problem and conduct numerical experiments for the resulting models. We can demonstrate that our models can be handled very well by standard mixed-integer linear solvers.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access