Source author record

Iman Soltani Mohammadi

Iman Soltani Mohammadi appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
1topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

GAMORRA: An API-Level Workload Model for Rasterization-based Graphics Pipeline Architecture

The performance of applications that require frame rendering time estimation or dynamic frequency scaling, rely on the accuracy of the workload model that is utilized within these applications. Existing models lack sufficient accuracy in their core model. Hence, they require changes to the target application or the hardware to produce accurate results. This paper introduces a mathematical workload model for a rasterization-based graphics Application Programming Interface (API) pipeline, named GAMORRA, which works based on the load and complexity of each stage of the pipeline. Firstly, GAMORRA models each stage of the pipeline based on their operation complexity and the input data size. Then, the calculated workloads of the stages are fed to a Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) model as explanatory variables. A hybrid offline/online training scheme is proposed as well to train the model. A suite of benchmarks is also designed to tune the model parameters based on the performance of the target system. The experiments were performed on Direct3D 11 and on two different rendering platforms comparing GAMORRA to an AutoRegressive (AR) model, a Frame Complexity Model (FCM) and a frequency-based (FRQ) model. The experiments show an average of 1.27 ms frame rendering time estimation error (9.45%) compared to an average of 1.87 ms error (13.23%) for FCM which is the best method among the three chosen methods. However, this comes at the cost of 0.54 ms (4.58%) increase in time complexity compared to FCM. Furthermore, GAMMORA improves frametime underestimations by 1.1% compared to FCM.