Source author record

Ilya D. Motyk

Ilya D. Motyk appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

The morphology of average solar flare time profiles from observations of the Sun's lower atmosphere

We study the decay phase of solar flares in several spectral bands using a method based on that successfully applied to white light flares observed on an M4 dwarf. We selected and processed 102 events detected in the Sun-as-a-star flux obtained with SDO/AIA images in the 1600~Å and 304~Å channels and 54 events detected in the 1700~Å channel. The main criterion for the selection of time profiles was a slow, continuous flux decay without significant new bursts. The obtained averaged time profiles were fitted with analytical templates, using different time intervals, that consisted of a combination of two independent exponents or a broken power law. The average flare profile observed in the 1700~Å channel decayed more slowly than the average flare profile observed on the M4 dwarf. As the 1700~Å emission is associated with a similar temperature to that usually ascribed to M dwarf flares, this implies that the M dwarf flare emission comes from a more dense layer than solar flare emission in the 1700~Å band. The cooling processes in solar flares were best described by the two exponents model, fitted over the intervals t1=[0, 0.5]$t_{1/2}$ and t2=[3, 10]$t_{1/2}$ where $t_{1/2}$ is time taken for the profile to decay to half the maximum value. The broken power law model provided a good fit to the first decay phase, as it was able to account for the impact of chromospheric plasma evaporation, but it did not successfully fit the second decay phase.