Goodness-of-fit statistics for approximate Bayesian computation
Approximate Bayesian computation is a statistical framework that uses numerical simulations to calibrate and compare models. Instead of computing likelihood functions, Approximate Bayesian computation relies on numerical simulations, which makes it applicable to complex models in ecology and evolution. As usual for statistical modeling, evaluating goodness-of-fit is a fundamental step for Approximate Bayesian Computation. Here, we introduce a goodness-of-fit approach based on hypothesis-testing. We introduce two test statistics based on the mean distance between numerical summaries of the data and simulated ones. One test statistic relies on summaries simulated with the prior predictive distribution whereas the other one relies on simulations from the posterior predictive distribution. For different coalescent models, we find that the statistics are well calibrated, meaning that the type I error can be controlled. However, the statistical power of the two statistics is extremely variable across models ranging from 20% to 100%. The difference of power between the two statistics is negligible in models of demographic inference but substantial in an additional and purely statistical example. When analyzing resequencing data to evaluate models of human demography, the two statistics confirm that an out-of-Africa bottleneck cannot be rejected for Asiatic and European data. We also consider two speciation models in the context of a butterfly species complex. One goodness-of-fit statistic indicates a poor fit for both models, and the numerical summaries causing the poor fit were identified using posterior predictive checks. Statistical tests for goodness-of-fit should foster evaluation of model fit in Approximate Bayesian Computation. The test statistic based on simulations from the prior predictive distribution is implemented in the gfit function of the R abc package.