BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Hussama Ismail

Hussama Ismail contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Logic in Computer ScienceSoftware Engineering

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - Baseline
3works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2015arXiv

Applying Multi-Core Model Checking to Hardware-Software Partitioning in Embedded Systems (extended version)

We present an alternative approach to solve the hardware (HW) and software (SW) partitioning problem, which uses Bounded Model Checking (BMC) based on Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT) in conjunction with a multi-core support using Open Multi-Processing. The multi-core SMT-based BMC approach allows initializing many verification instances based on processors cores numbers available to the model checker. Each instance checks for a different optimum value until the optimization problem is satisfied. The goal is to show that multi-core model-checking techniques can be effective, in particular cases, to find the optimal solution of the HW-SW partitioning problem using an SMT-based BMC approach. We compare the experimental results of our proposed approach with Integer Linear Programming and the Genetic Algorithm.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Model Checking C Programs with Loops via k-Induction and Invariants

We present a novel proof by induction algorithm, which combines k-induction with invariants to model check C programs with bounded and unbounded loops. The k-induction algorithm consists of three cases: in the base case, we aim to find a counterexample with up to k loop unwindings; in the forward condition, we check whether loops have been fully unrolled and that the safety property P holds in all states reachable within k unwindings; and in the inductive step, we check that whenever P holds for k unwindings, it also holds after the next unwinding of the system. For each step of the k-induction algorithm, we infer invariants using affine constraints (i.e., polyhedral) to specify pre- and post-conditions. The algorithm was implemented in two different ways, with and without invariants using polyhedral, and the results were compared. Experimental results show that both forms can handle a wide variety of safety properties; however, the k-induction algorithm adopting polyhedral solves more verification tasks, which demonstrate an improvement of the induction algorithm effectiveness.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Model Checking Embedded C Software using k-Induction and Invariants (extended version)

We present a proof by induction algorithm, which combines k-induction with invariants to model check embedded C software with bounded and unbounded loops. The k-induction algorithm consists of three cases: in the base case, we aim to find a counterexample with up to k loop unwindings; in the forward condition, we check whether loops have been fully unrolled and that the safety property P holds in all states reachable within k unwindings; and in the inductive step, we check that whenever P holds for k unwindings, it also holds after the next unwinding of the system. For each step of the k-induction algorithm, we infer invariants using affine constraints (i.e., polyhedral) to specify pre- and post-conditions. Experimental results show that our approach can handle a wide variety of safety properties in typical embedded software applications from telecommunications, control systems, and medical devices; we demonstrate an improvement of the induction algorithm effectiveness if compared to other approaches.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access