Source author record

Huixian Li

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

3works
2topics
4close collaborators

Published work

3 publications

preprint2022arXiv

Detailed analysis on the reflection component for the black hole candidate MAXI J1348-630

The black hole candidate MAXI J1348-630 was discovered on January 26th, 2019, with the Gas Slit Camera (GSC) on-board \textit{MAXI}. We report a detailed spectral analysis of this source by using the archived data of \textit{NuSTAR}. A total of 9 observations covered the complete outburst evolution of MAXI J1348-630 from the hard state to the soft state and finally back to the hard state. Additionally, the intermediate state is found in the transition from the hard state to the soft state. We use the state-of-art reflection model \verb'relxill' family to fit all the 9 spectra, and the spectra from two focal plane module detectors of \textit{NuSTAR} are jointly fitted for each observation. In particular, we concentrate on the results of the black hole spin parameter and the inclination of the accretion disk. Based on the analysis of the inner radius of the accretion disk, we obtain the spin parameter a∗=0.78−0.04+0.04a_* =0.78_{-0.04}^{+0.04}, and the inclination angle of the inner disk i=29.2−0.5+0.3i = 29.2_{-0.5}^{+0.3} degrees. Furthermore, we also find that when the black hole is in the hard state, the accretion disk would show a significant truncation. The high iron abundance and ionization of the accretion disk obtained in the fitting results can be possibly explained by the high density of the accretion disk.

preprint2021arXiv

Spectral Analysis of New Black Hole Candidate AT2019wey Observed by NuSTAR

AT2019wey is a new galactic X-ray binary that was first discovered as an optical transient by the Australia Telescope Large Area Survey (ATLAS) on December 7, 2019. AT2019wey consists of a black hole candidate as well as a low-mass companion star (Mstar ≲0.8M⊙M_{\text {star }} \lesssim 0.8 M_{\odot}) and is likely to have a short orbital period (Porb ≲8P_{\text {orb }} \lesssim 8 h). Although AT2019wey began activation in the X-ray band during almost the entire outburst on March 8, 2020, it did not enter the soft state during the entire outburst. In this study, we present a detailed spectral analysis of AT2019wey in the low/hard state during its X-ray outburst on the basis of Nuclear Spectroscopic Telescope Array \emph observations. We obtain tight constraints on several of its important physical parameters by applying the State-of-art \texttt{relxill} relativistic reflection model family. In particular, we determine that the measured inner radius of the accretion disk is most likely to have extended to the innermost stable circular orbit (ISCO) radius, i.e., Rin=1.38−0.16+0.23 RISCOR_{\text{in}}=1.38^{+0.23}_{-0.16}~R_{\text{ISCO}}. Hence, assuming RinR_{\text{in}}=RISCOR_{\text{ISCO}}, we find the spin of AT2019wey to be a∗∼a_{*}\sim 0.970.97, which is close to the extreme and an inner disk inclination angle of ~i∼i\sim 22∘22 ^{\circ}. Additionally, according to our adopted models, AT2019wey tends to have a relatively high iron abundance of AFe∼A_{\mathrm{Fe}}\sim 5 AFe,⊙A_{\mathrm{Fe}, \odot} and a high disk ionization state of log⁡ξ∼\log ξ\sim 3.4.

preprint2015arXiv

Outflows and Bubbles in Taurus: Star-formation Feedback Sufficient to Maintain Turbulence

We have identified outflows and bubbles in the Taurus molecular cloud based on the ∼100\sim 100 deg2^2 Five College Radio Astronomy Observatory 12^{12}CO(1-0) and 13^{13}CO(1-0) maps and the Spitzer young stellar object catalogs. In the main 44 deg2^2 area of Taurus we found 55 outflows, of which 31 were previously unknown. We also found 37 bubbles in the entire 100 deg2^2 area of Taurus, all of which had not been found before. The total kinetic energy of the identified outflows is estimated to be ∼3.9×1045\bf \sim 3.9 \times 10^{45} erg, which is \textbf{1\%} of the cloud turbulent energy. The total kinetic energy of the detected bubbles is estimated to be ∼9.2×1046\sim 9.2 \times 10^{46} erg, which is 29\% of the turbulent energy of Taurus. The energy injection rate from outflows is ∼1.3×1033 erg s−1\bf \sim 1.3 \times 10^{33}~\rm erg\ s^{-1}, \textbf{0.4 - 2 times} the dissipation rate of the cloud turbulence. The energy injection rate from bubbles is ∼6.4×1033\sim 6.4 \times 10^{33} erg s−1^{-1}, \textbf{2 - 10 times} the turbulent dissipation rate of the cloud. The gravitational binding energy of the cloud is ∼1.5×1048\bf \sim 1.5 \times 10^{48} {\bf erg}, \textbf{385} and 16 times the energy of outflows and bubbles, respectively. We conclude that neither outflows nor bubbles can \textbf{provide enough energy to balance the overall gravitational binding energy and the turbulent energy of Taurus. However,} in the current epoch, stellar feedback is sufficient to maintain the observed turbulence in Taurus.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.