Source author record

Hugh Zhang

Hugh Zhang appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A Simple Adaptive Procedure Converging to Forgiving Correlated Equilibria

Simple adaptive procedures that converge to correlated equilibria are known to exist for normal form games (Hart and Mas-Colell 2000), but no such analogue exists for extensive-form games. Leveraging inspiration from Zinkevich et al. (2008), we show that any internal regret minimization procedure designed for normal-form games can be efficiently extended to finite extensive-form games of perfect recall. Our procedure converges to the set of forgiving correlated equilibria, a refinement of various other proposed extensions of the correlated equilibrium solution concept to extensive-form games (Forges 1986a; Forges 1986b; von Stengel and Forges 2008). In a forgiving correlated equilibrium, players receive move recommendations only upon reaching the relevant information set instead of all at once at the beginning of the game. Assuming all other players follow their recommendations, each player is incentivized to follow her recommendations regardless of whether she has done so at previous infosets. The resulting procedure is completely decentralized: players need neither knowledge of their opponents' actions nor even a complete understanding of the game itself beyond their own payoffs and strategies.

preprint2022arXiv

Equilibrium Finding in Normal-Form Games Via Greedy Regret Minimization

We extend the classic regret minimization framework for approximating equilibria in normal-form games by greedily weighing iterates based on regrets observed at runtime. Theoretically, our method retains all previous convergence rate guarantees. Empirically, experiments on large randomly generated games and normal-form subgames of the AI benchmark Diplomacy show that greedy weights outperforms previous methods whenever sampling is used, sometimes by several orders of magnitude.

preprint2020arXiv

Trading Off Diversity and Quality in Natural Language Generation

For open-ended language generation tasks such as storytelling and dialogue, choosing the right decoding algorithm is critical to controlling the tradeoff between generation quality and diversity. However, there presently exists no consensus on which decoding procedure is best or even the criteria by which to compare them. We address these issues by casting decoding as a multi-objective optimization problem aiming to simultaneously maximize both response quality and diversity. Our framework enables us to perform the first large-scale evaluation of decoding methods along the entire quality-diversity spectrum. We find that when diversity is a priority, all methods perform similarly, but when quality is viewed as more important, the recently proposed nucleus sampling (Holtzman et al. 2019) outperforms all other evaluated decoding algorithms. Our experiments also confirm the existence of the `likelihood trap', the counter-intuitive observation that high likelihood sequences are often surprisingly low quality. We leverage our findings to create and evaluate an algorithm called \emph{selective sampling} which tractably approximates globally-normalized temperature sampling.