Researcher profile

Howard L. Richards

Howard L. Richards contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2013arXiv

Phase separation on a hyperbolic lattice

We report a preliminary numerical study by kinetic Monte Carlo simulation of the dynamics of phase separation following a quench from high to low temperature in a system with a single, conserved, scalar order parameter (a kinetic Ising ferromagnet) confined to a hyperbolic lattice. The results are compared with simulations of the same system on two different, Euclidean lattices, in which cases we observe power-law domain growth with an exponent near the theoretically known value of 1/3. For the hyperbolic lattice we observe much slower domain growth, consistent to within our current accuracy with power-law growth with a much smaller exponent near 0.13. The paper also includes a brief introduction to non-Euclidean lattices and their mapping to the Euclidean plane.

preprint2005arXiv

Step Position Distributions and the Pairwise Einstein Model for Steps on Crystal Surfaces

The Pairwise Einstein Model (PEM) of steps not only justifies the use of the Generalized Wigner Distribution (GWD) for Terrace Width Distributions (TWDs), it also predicts a specific form for the Step Position Distribution (SPD), i.e., the probability density function for the fluctuations of a step about its average position. The predicted form of the SPD is well approximated by a Gaussian with a finite variance. However, the variance of the SPD measured from either real surfaces or Monte Carlo simulations depends on $Δy$, the length of step over which it is calculated, with the measured variance diverging in the limit $Δy \to \infty$. As a result, a length scale $L_{\rm W}$ can be defined as the value of $Δy$ at which the measured and theoretical SPDs agree. Monte Carlo simulations of the terrace-step-kink model indicate that $L_{\rm W} \approx 14.2 ξ_Q$, where $ξ_Q$ is the correlation length in the direction parallel to the steps, independent of the strength of the step-step repulsion. $L_{\rm W}$ can also be understood as the length over which a {\em single} terrace must be sampled for the TWD to bear a "reasonable" resemblence to the GWD.

preprint2000arXiv

Terrace-Width Distributions and Step-Step Repulsions on Vicinal Surfaces: Symmetries, Scaling, Simplifications, Subtleties, and Schrödinger

For more than three decades, measurement of terrace width distributions (TWDs) of vicinal crystal surfaces have been recognized as arguably the best way to determine the dimensionless strength $\tilde{A}$ of the elastic repulsion between steps. For sufficiently strong repulsions, the TWD is expected to be Gaussian, with $\tilde{A}$ varying inversely with the squared variance. However, there has been a controversy over the proportionality constant. From another perspective the TWD can be described as a continuous generalized Wigner distribution (CGWD) essentially no more complicated than a Gaussian but a much better approximation at the few calibration points where exact solutions exist. This paper combines concisely the experimentally most useful results from several earlier papers on this subject and describes some advancements that are in progress regarding numerical tests and in using Schrödinger-equation formalism to give greater understanding of the origin of the CGWD and to give hope of extensions to more general interaction potentials between steps. There are many implications for future experiments.