Source author record

Hossein Jowhari

Hossein Jowhari appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Data Structures and Algorithms Computational Complexity Databases

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works

3topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2016arXiv

A Second Look at Counting Triangles in Graph Streams (revised)

In this paper we present improved results on the problem of counting triangles in edge streamed graphs. For graphs with $m$ edges and at least $T$ triangles, we show that an extra look over the stream yields a two-pass treaming algorithm that uses $O(\frac{m}{\eps^{2.5}\sqrt{T}}\polylog(m))$ space and outputs a $(1+\eps)$ approximation of the number of triangles in the graph. This improves upon the two-pass streaming tester of Braverman, Ostrovsky and Vilenchik, ICALP 2013, which distinguishes between triangle-free graphs and graphs with at least $T$ triangle using $O(\frac{m}{T^{1/3}})$ space. Also, in terms of dependence on $T$, we show that more passes would not lead to a better space bound. In other words, we prove there is no constant pass streaming algorithm that distinguishes between triangle-free graphs from graphs with at least $T$ triangles using $O(\frac{m}{T^{1/2+ρ}})$ space for any constant $ρ\ge 0$.

preprint2016arXiv

The Sparse Awakens: Streaming Algorithms for Matching Size Estimation in Sparse Graphs

Estimating the size of the maximum matching is a canonical problem in graph algorithms, and one that has attracted extensive study over a range of different computational models. We present improved streaming algorithms for approximating the size of maximum matching with sparse (bounded arboricity) graphs. * Insert-Only Streams: We present a one-pass algorithm that takes O(c log^2 n) space and approximates the size of the maximum matching in graphs with arboricity c within a factor of O(c). This improves significantly on the state-of-the-art O~(cn^{2/3})-space streaming algorithms. * Dynamic Streams: Given a dynamic graph stream (i.e., inserts and deletes) of edges of an underlying c-bounded arboricity graph, we present a one-pass algorithm that uses space O~(c^{10/3}n^{2/3}) and returns an O(c)-estimator for the size of the maximum matching. This algorithm improves the state-of-the-art O~(cn^{4/5})-space algorithms, where the O~(.) notation hides logarithmic in $n$ dependencies. In contrast to the previous works, our results take more advantage of the streaming access to the input and characterize the matching size based on the ordering of the edges in the stream in addition to the degree distributions and structural properties of the sparse graphs.

preprint2010arXiv

Tight Bounds for Lp Samplers, Finding Duplicates in Streams, and Related Problems

In this paper, we present near-optimal space bounds for Lp-samplers. Given a stream of updates (additions and subtraction) to the coordinates of an underlying vector x \in R^n, a perfect Lp sampler outputs the i-th coordinate with probability |x_i|^p/||x||_p^p. In SODA 2010, Monemizadeh and Woodruff showed polylog space upper bounds for approximate Lp-samplers and demonstrated various applications of them. Very recently, Andoni, Krauthgamer and Onak improved the upper bounds and gave a O(ε^{-p} log^3 n) space εrelative error and constant failure rate Lp-sampler for p \in [1,2]. In this work, we give another such algorithm requiring only O(ε^{-p} log^2 n) space for p \in (1,2). For p \in (0,1), our space bound is O(ε^{-1} log^2 n), while for the $p=1$ case we have an O(log(1/ε)ε^{-1} log^2 n) space algorithm. We also give a O(log^2 n) bits zero relative error L0-sampler, improving the O(log^3 n) bits algorithm due to Frahling, Indyk and Sohler. As an application of our samplers, we give better upper bounds for the problem of finding duplicates in data streams. In case the length of the stream is longer than the alphabet size, L1 sampling gives us an O(log^2 n) space algorithm, thus improving the previous O(log^3 n) bound due to Gopalan and Radhakrishnan. In the second part of our work, we prove an Omega(log^2 n) lower bound for sampling from 0, \pm 1 vectors (in this special case, the parameter p is not relevant for Lp sampling). This matches the space of our sampling algorithms for constant ε> 0. We also prove tight space lower bounds for the finding duplicates and heavy hitters problems. We obtain these lower bounds using reductions from the communication complexity problem augmented indexing.