A Note on Nested String Replacements
We investigate the number of nested string replacements required to reduce a string of identical characters to one character.
Source author record
Holger Petersen
Holger Petersen appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.
ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Catalog footprint
What is connected
13works
3topics
3close collaborators
Research graph
See the researcher in context
Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.
Building this map preview
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Published work
13 published item(s)
preprint2016arXiv
Counting Ones Without Broadword Operations
A lower time bound $Ω(\min(ν(x), n-ν(x))$ for counting the number of ones in a binary input word $x$ of length $n$ is presented, where $ν(x)$ is the number of ones. The operations available are increment, decrement, bit-wise logical operations, and assignment. The only constant available is zero. An almost matching upper bound is also obtained.
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv
A Non-Oblivious Reduction of Counting Ones to Multiplication
An algorithm counting the number of ones in a binary word is presented running in time $O(\log\log b)$ where $b$ is the number of ones. The operations available include bit-wise logical operations and multiplication.
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv
A SWAR Approach to Counting Ones
We investigate the complexity of algorithms counting ones in different sets of operations. With addition and logical operations (but no shift) $O(\log^2(n))$ steps suffice to count ones. Parity can be computed with complexity $O(\log(n))$, which is the same bound as for methods using shift-operations. If multiplication is available, a solution of time complexity $O(\log^*(n))$ is possible improving the known bound $O(\log\log(n))$.
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv
An NL-Complete Puzzle
We investigate the complexity of a puzzle that turns out to be NL-complete.
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv
Efficient Computation by Three Counter Machines
We show that multiplication can be done in polynomial time on a three counter machine that receives its input as the contents of two counters. The technique is generalized to functions of two variables computable by deterministic Turing machines in linear space.
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv
On Practical Regular Expressions
We report on simulation, hierarchy, and decidability results for Practical Regular Expressions (PRE), which may include back references in addition to the standard operations union, concatenation, and star. The following results are obtained: PRE can be simulated by the classical model of nondeterministic finite automata with sensing one-way heads. The number of heads depends on the number of different variables in the expressions. A space bound O(n log m) for matching a text of length m with a PRE with n variables based on the previous simulation. This improves the bound O(nm) from (Câmpeanu and Santean 2009). PRE cannot be simulated by deterministic finite automata with at most three sensing one-way heads or deterministic finite automata with any number of non-sensing one-way heads. PRE with a bounded number of occurrences of variables in any match can be simulated by nondeterministic finite automata with one-way heads. There is a tight hierarchy of PRE with a growing number of non-nested variables over a fixed alphabet. A previously known hierarchy was based on nested variables and growing alphabets (Larsen 1998). Matching of PRE without star over a single-letter alphabet is NP-complete. This strengthens the corresponding result for expressions over larger alphabets and with star (Aho 1990). Inequivalence of PRE without closure operators is Sigma^P_2-complete. The decidability of universality of PRE over a single letter alphabet is linked to the existence of Fermat Primes. Greibach's Theorem applies to languages characterized by PRE.
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv
Simpler, faster and shorter labels for distances in graphs
We consider how to assign labels to any undirected graph with n nodes such that, given the labels of two nodes and no other information regarding the graph, it is possible to determine the distance between the two nodes. The challenge in such a distance labeling scheme is primarily to minimize the maximum label lenght and secondarily to minimize the time needed to answer distance queries (decoding). Previous schemes have offered different trade-offs between label lengths and query time. This paper presents a simple algorithm with shorter labels and shorter query time than any previous solution, thereby improving the state-of-the-art with respect to both label length and query time in one single algorithm. Our solution addresses several open problems concerning label length and decoding time and is the first improvement of label length for more than three decades. More specifically, we present a distance labeling scheme with label size (log 3)/2 + o(n) (logarithms are in base 2) and O(1) decoding time. This outperforms all existing results with respect to both size and decoding time, including Winkler's (Combinatorica 1983) decade-old result, which uses labels of size (log 3)n and O(n/log n) decoding time, and Gavoille et al. (SODA'01), which uses labels of size 11n + o(n) and O(loglog n) decoding time. In addition, our algorithm is simpler than the previous ones. In the case of integral edge weights of size at most W, we present almost matching upper and lower bounds for label sizes. For r-additive approximation schemes, where distances can be off by an additive constant r, we give both upper and lower bounds. In particular, we present an upper bound for 1-additive approximation schemes which, in the unweighted case, has the same size (ignoring second order terms) as an adjacency scheme: n/2. We also give results for bipartite graphs and for exact and 1-additive distance oracles.
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv
The Complexity of Some Combinatorial Puzzles
We show that the decision versions of the puzzles Knossos and The Hour-Glass are complete for NP.
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv
A Note on Pushdown Automata Systems
In (Csuhaj-Varju et. al. 2000) Parallel Communicating Systems of Pushdown Automata (PCPA) were introduced and shown to be able to simulate nondeterministic one-way multi-head pushdown automata in returning mode, even if communication is restricted to be one-way having a single target component. A simulation of such centralized PCPA by one-way multi-head pushdown automata (Balan 2009) turned out to be incomplete (Otto 2012). Subsequently it was shown that centralized returning PCPA are universal even if the number of components is two (Petersen 2013) and thus are separated from one-way multi-head pushdown automata. Another line of research modified the definition of PCPA such that communication is asynchronous (Otto 2013). While the simulation of one-way multi-head pushdown automata is still possible, now a converse construction shows this model in returning mode to be equivalent to the one-way multi-head pushdown automaton in a very precise sense. It was left open, whether non-centralized returning PCPA of degree two are universal. In the first part of the paper we show this to be the case. Then we turn our attention to Uniform Distributed Pushdown Automata Systems (UDPAS). These systems of automata work in turn on a single tape. We show that UPDAS accepting with empty stack do not form a hierarchy depending on the number of components and that the membership problem is complete in NP, answering two open problems from (Arroyo et. al. 2012).
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv
A Note on Kolmogorov-Uspensky Machines
Solving an open problem stated by Shvachko, it is shown that a language which is not real-time recognizable by some variants of pointer machines can be accepted by a Kolmogorov-Uspensky machine in real-time.
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv
Bounded Counter Languages
We show that deterministic finite automata equipped with $k$ two-way heads are equivalent to deterministic machines with a single two-way input head and $k-1$ linearly bounded counters if the accepted language is strictly bounded, i.e., a subset of $a_1^*a_2^*... a_m^*$ for a fixed sequence of symbols $a_1, a_2,..., a_m$. Then we investigate linear speed-up for counter machines. Lower and upper time bounds for concrete recognition problems are shown, implying that in general linear speed-up does not hold for counter machines. For bounded languages we develop a technique for speeding up computations by any constant factor at the expense of adding a fixed number of counters.
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv
The Power of Centralized PC Systems of Pushdown Automata
Parallel communicating systems of pushdown automata (PCPA) were introduced in (Csuhaj-Varj{ú} et. al. 2000) and in their centralized variants shown to be able to simulate nondeterministic one-way multi-head pushdown automata. A claimed converse simulation for returning mode (Balan 2009) turned out to be incomplete (Otto 2012) and a language was suggested for separating these PCPA of degree two (number of pushdown automata) from nondeterministic one-way two-head pushdown automata. We show that the suggested language can be accepted by the latter computational model. We present a different example over a single letter alphabet indeed ruling out the possibility of a simulation between the models. The open question about the power of centralized PCPA working in returning mode is then settled by showing them to be universal. Since the construction is possible using systems of degree two, this also improves the previous bound three for generating all recursively enumerable languages. Finally PCPAs are restricted in such a way that a simulation by multi-head automata is possible.
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access