BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Herman Haverkort

Herman Haverkort contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Computational Geometrymath.MG

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Analysis of a Greedy Heuristic for the Labeling of a Map with a Time-Window Interface

In this paper, we analyze the approximation quality of a greedy heuristic for automatic map labeling. As input, we have a set of events, each associated with a label at a fixed position, a timestamp, and a weight. Let a time-window labeling be a selection of these labels such that all corresponding timestamps lie in a queried time window and no two labels overlap. A solution to the time-window labeling problem consists of a data structure that encodes a time-window labeling for each possible time window; when a user specifies a time window of interest using a slider interface, we query the data structure for the corresponding labeling. We define the quality of a time-window labeling solution as the sum of the weights of the labels in each time-window labeling, integrated over all time windows. We aim at maximizing the quality under the condition that a label may never disappear when the user shrinks the time window. In this paper, we analyze how well a greedy heuristic approximates the maximum quality that can be realized under this condition. On the one hand, we present an instance with square labels of equal size and equal weight for which the greedy heuristic fails to find a solution of at least 1/4 of the quality of an optimal solution. On the other hand, we prove that the greedy heuristic does guarantee a solution with at least 1/8 of the quality of an optimal solution. In the case of disk-shaped labels of equal size and equal weight, the greedy heuristic gives a solution with at least 1/10 of the quality of an optimal solution. If the labels are squares or disks of equal size and the maximum weight divided by the minimum weight is at most b, then the greedy heuristic has approximation ratio Theta(log b).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Minimum-Error Triangulations for Sea Surface Reconstruction

We apply state-of-the-art computational geometry methods to the problem of reconstructing a time-varying sea surface from tide gauge records. Our work builds on a recent article by Nitzke et al.~(Computers \& Geosciences, 157:104920, 2021) who have suggested to learn a triangulation $D$ of a given set of tide gauge stations. The objective is to minimize the misfit of the piecewise linear surface induced by $D$ to a reference surface that has been acquired with satellite altimetry. The authors restricted their search to k-order Delaunay ($k$-OD) triangulations and used an integer linear program in order to solve the resulting optimization problem. In geometric terms, the input to our problem consists of two sets of points in $\mathbb{R}^2$ with elevations: a set $\mathcal{S}$ that is to be triangulated, and a set $\mathcal{R}$ of reference points. Intuitively, we define the error of a triangulation as the average vertical distance of a point in $\mathcal{R}$ to the triangulated surface that is obtained by interpolating elevations of $\mathcal{S}$ linearly in each triangle. Our goal is to find the triangulation of $\mathcal{S}$ that has minimum error with respect to $\mathcal{R}$. In our work, we prove that the minimum-error triangulation problem is NP-hard and cannot be approximated within any multiplicative factor in polynomial time unless $P=NP$. At the same time we show that the problem instances that occur in our application (considering sea level data from several hundreds of tide gauge stations worldwide) can be solved relatively fast using dynamic programming when restricted to $k$-OD triangulations for $k\le 7$. In particular, instances for which the number of connected components of the so-called $k$-OD fixed-edge graph is small can be solved within few seconds.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

The limit of $L_p$ Voronoi diagrams as $p \rightarrow 0$ is the bounding-box-area Voronoi diagram

We consider the Voronoi diagram of points in the real plane when the distance between two points $a$ and $b$ is given by $L_p(a-b)$ where $L_p((x,y)) = (|x|^p+|y|^p)^{1/p}.$ We prove that the Voronoi diagram has a limit as $p$ converges to zero from above or from below: it is the diagram that corresponds to the distance function $L_*((x,y)) = |xy|$. In this diagram, the bisector of two points in general position consists of a line and two branches of a hyperbola that split the plane into three faces per point. We propose to name $L_*$ as defined above the "geometric $L_0$ distance".

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Plane-filling trails

The order in which plane-filling curves visit points in the plane can be exploited to design efficient algorithms. Typically, the curves are useful because they preserve locality: points that are close to each other along the curve tend to be close to each other in the plane, and vice versa. However, sketches of plane-filling curves do not show this well: they are hard to read on different levels of detail and it is hard to see how far apart points are along the curve. This paper presents a software tool to produce compelling visualisations that may give more insight in the structure of the curves.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Recursive tilings and space-filling curves with little fragmentation

This paper defines the Arrwwid number of a recursive tiling (or space-filling curve) as the smallest number w such that any ball Q can be covered by w tiles (or curve sections) with total volume O(vol(Q)). Recursive tilings and space-filling curves with low Arrwwid numbers can be applied to optimise disk, memory or server access patterns when processing sets of points in d-dimensional space. This paper presents recursive tilings and space-filling curves with optimal Arrwwid numbers. For d >= 3, we see that regular cube tilings and space-filling curves cannot have optimal Arrwwid number, and we see how to construct alternatives with better Arrwwid numbers.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access