BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Herbert S. Wilf

Herbert S. Wilf contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.COmath.PROther Quantitative BiologyPopulations and Evolution

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - Baseline
5works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2010arXiv

On the growth of restricted integer partition functions

We study the rate of growth of $p(n,S,M)$, the number of partitions of $n$ whose parts all belong to $S$ and whose multiplicities all belong to $M$, where $S$ (resp. $M$) are given infinite sets of positive (resp. nonnegative) integers. We show that if $M$ is all nonnegative integers then $p(n,S,M)$ cannot be of only polynomial growth, and that no sharper statement can be made. We ask: if $p(n,S,M)>0$ for all large enough $n$, can $p(n,S,M)$ be of polynomial growth in $n$?

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

There's plenty of time for evolution

Objections to Darwinian evolution are often based on the time required to carry out the necessary mutations. Seemingly, exponential numbers of mutations are needed. We show that such estimates ignore the effects of natural selection, and that the numbers of necessary mutations are thereby reduced to about $K\log{L}$, rather than $K^L$, where $L$ is the length of the genomic "word", and $K$ is the number of possible "letters" that can occupy any position in the word. The required theory makes contact with the theory of radix-exchange sorting in theoretical computer science, and the asymptotic analysis of certain sums that occur there.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2003arXiv

Regularly spaced subsums of integer partitions

For integer partitions $λ:n=a_1+...+a_k$, where $a_1\ge a_2\ge >...\ge a_k\ge 1$, we study the sum $a_1+a_3+...$ of the parts of odd index. We show that the average of this sum, over all partitions $λ$ of $n$, is of the form $n/2+(\sqrt{6}/(8π))\sqrt{n}\log{n}+c_{2,1}\sqrt{n}+O(\log{n}).$ More generally, we study the sum $a_i+a_{m+i}+a_{2m+i}+...$ of the parts whose indices lie in a given arithmetic progression and we show that the average of this sum, over all partitions of $n$, is of the form $n/m+b_{m,i}\sqrt{n}\log{n}+c_{m,i}\sqrt{n}+O(\log{n})$, with explicitly given constants $b_{m,i},c_{m,i}$. Interestingly, for $m$ odd and $i=(m+1)/2$ we have $b_{m,i}=0$, so in this case the error term is of lower order. The methods used involve asymptotic formulas for the behavior of Lambert series and the Zeta function of Hurwitz. We also show that if $f(n,j)$ is the number of partitions of $n$ the sum of whose parts of even index is $j$, then for every $n$, $f(n,j)$ agrees with a certain universal sequence, Sloane's sequence \texttt{#A000712}, for $j\le n/3$ but not for any larger $j$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint1994arXiv

Counting pairs of lattice paths by intersections

On an $r\times (n-r)$ lattice rectangle, we first consider walks that begin at the SW corner, proceed with unit steps in either of the directions E or N, and terminate at the NE corner of the rectangle. For each integer $k$ we ask for $N_k^{n,r}$, the number of {\em ordered\/} pairs of these walks that intersect in exactly $k$ points. The number of points in the intersection of two such walks is defined as the cardinality of the intersection of their two sets of vertices, excluding the initial and terminal vertices. We find two explicit formulas for the numbers $N_k^{n,r}$. Next we note that $N_1^{n,r}= 2 N_0^{n,r}$, i.e., that {\em exactly twice as many pairs of walks have a single intersection as have no intersection\/}. Such a relationship clearly merits a bijective proof, and we supply one. We discuss a number of related results for different assumptions on the two walks. We find the probability that two independent walkers on a given lattice rectangle do not meet. In this situation, the walkers start at the two points $(a,b+x+1)$ and (a+x+1,b)$ in the first quadrant, and walk West or South at each step, except that when a walker reaches the $x$-axis (resp. the $y$-axis) then all future steps are constrained to be South (resp. West) until the origin is reached. We find that if the probability $p(i,j)$ that a step from $(i,j)$ will go West depends only on $i+j$, then the probabilty that the two walkers do not meet until they reach the origin is the same as the probability that a single (unconstrained) walker who starts at $(a, b+x+1)$ and and takes $a+b+x$ steps, finishes at one of the points $(0,1), (-1,2), \ldots, (-x,1+x)$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access