Source author record

Helin Gong

Helin Gong appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Proving a conjecture on chromatic polynomials by counting the number of acyclic orientations

The chromatic polynomial $P(G,x)$ of a graph $G$ of order $n$ can be expressed as $\sum\limits_{i=1}^n(-1)^{n-i}a_{i}x^i$, where $a_i$ is interpreted as the number of broken-cycle free spanning subgraphs of $G$ with exactly $i$ components. The parameter $ε(G)=\sum\limits_{i=1}^n (n-i)a_i/\sum\limits_{i=1}^n a_i$ is the mean size of a broken-cycle-free spanning subgraph of $G$. In this article, we confirm and strengthen a conjecture proposed by Lundow and Markström in 2006 that $ε(T_n)< ε(G)<ε(K_n)$ holds for any connected graph $G$ of order $n$ which is neither the complete graph $K_n$ nor a tree $T_n$ of order $n$. The most crucial step of our proof is to obtain the interpretation of all $a_i$'s by the number of acyclic orientations of $G$.

preprint2015arXiv

A formula for the number of the spanning trees of line graphs

Let $G=(V,E)$ be a loopless graph and $\mathcal{T}(G)$ be the set of all spanning trees of $G$. Let $L(G)$ be the line graph of the graph $G$ and $t(L(G))$ be the number of spanning trees of $L(G)$. Then, by using techniques from electrical networks, we obtain the following formula: $$ t(L(G)) = \frac{1}{\prod_{v\in V}d^2(v)}\sum_{T\subseteq \mathcal{T}(G)}\big[\prod_{e = xy\in T}d(x)d(y)\big]\big[\prod_{e = uv\in E\backslash T}[d(u)+d(v)]\big]. $$ As a result, we provide a very simple and different proof of the formula on the number of spanning trees of some irregular line graphs, and give a positive answer to a conjecture proposed by Yan [J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 120 (2013) no. 7, 1642-1648]. By applying our formula we also derive the number of spanning trees of circulant line graphs.