BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Helena Junicke

Helena Junicke contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Quantitative Methodsphysics.chem-ph

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Benchmarking real-time monitoring strategies for ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass

The goal of this paper is to review and critically assess different methods to monitor key process variables for ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass. Because cellulose-based biofuels cannot yet compete with non-cellulosic biofuels, process control and optimization are of importance to lower the production costs. This study reviews different monitoring schemes, to indicate what the added value of real-time monitoring is for process control. Furthermore, a comparison is made on different monitoring techniques to measure the off-gas, the concentrations of dissolved components in the inlet to the process, the concentrations of dissolved components in the reactor, and the biomass concentration. Finally, soft sensor techniques and available models are discussed, to give an overview of modeling techniques that analyze data, with the aim of coupling the soft sensor predictions to the control and optimization of cellulose to ethanol fermentation. The paper ends with a discussion of future needs and developments.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Comment on "A compilation and bioenergetic evaluation of syntrophic microbial growth yields in anaerobic digestion" by Patón, M. and Rodríguez, J. [Water Research 162 (2019), 516-517]

Recent efforts have focused on providing a systematic analysis of syntrophic microbial growth yields. These biokinetic parameters are key to developing an accurate mathematical description of the anaerobic digestion process. The agreement between experimentally determined growth yields and those obtained from bioenergetic estimations is therefore of great interest. Considering five important syntrophic groups, including acetoclastic and hydrogenotrophic methanogens, as well as propionate, butyrate and lactate oxidizers, previous findings suggest that measured and estimated growth yields were consistent only for acetoclastic methanogens. A re-analysis revealed that data are also consistent for lactate oxidizers and hydrogenotrophic methanogens, whereas the limited data available for propionate and butyrate oxidizers are unsupportive of firm conclusions. These results highlight pertinent challenges in the analysis of microbial syntrophy and encourage more accurate measurements of syntrophic microbial growth yields in the future.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Electrochemical tuning of alcohol oxidase and dehydrogenase catalysis via biosensing towards butanol-1 detection in fermentation media

A novel approach for electrochemical tuning of alcohol oxidase (AOx) and alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) biocatalysis towards butanol-1 oxidation by incorporating enzymes in various designs of amperometric biosensors is presented. The biosensors were developed by using commercial graphene oxide-based screen-printed electrodes and varying enzyme producing strains, encapsulation approaches (layer-by-layer (LbL) or one-step electrodeposition (EcD)), layers composition and structure, operating conditions (applied potential values) and introducing mediators (Meldola Blue and Prussian Blue) or Pd-nanoparticles (Pd-NPs). Simultaneous analysis/screening of multiple crucial system parameters during the enzyme engineering process allowed to identify within a period of one month that four out of twelve proposed designs demonstrated a good signal reproducibility and linear response (up to 14.6 mM of butanol) under very low applied potentials (from -0.02 to -0.32 V). Their mechanical stability was thoroughly investigated by multi-analytical techniques prior to butanol determination in cell-free samples from an anaerobic butanol fermentation. The EcD-based biosensor that incorporates ADH, NAD+, Pd-NPs and Nafion showed no loss of enzyme activity after preparation and demonstrated capabilities towards low potential (-0.12 V) detection of butanol-1 in fermentation medium (4 mM) containing multiple electroactive species with almost 15 times enhanced sensitivity (0.2282 $μ$A/mM $\pm$ 0.05) when compared to the LbL design. Furthermore, the ADH-Nafion bonding for the S. cerevisiae strain was confirmed to be 3 times higher than for E. coli.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access