BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Hassan L. Hijazi

Hassan L. Hijazi contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.OCComputational Engineering, Finance, and ScienceComputer VisionSystems and Control

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Benchmarking Large-Scale ACOPF Solutions and Optimality Bounds

We present the results of a comprehensive benchmarking effort aimed at evaluating and comparing state-of-the-art open-source tools for solving the Alternating-Current Optimal Power Flow (ACOPF) problem. Our numerical experiments include all instances found in the public library PGLIB with network sizes up to 30,000 nodes. The benchmarked tools span a number of programming languages (Python, Julia, Matlab/Octave, and C$++$), nonlinear optimization solvers (Ipopt, MIPS, and INLP) as well as different mathematical modeling tools (JuMP and Gravity). We also present state-of-the-art optimality bounds obtained using sparsity-exploiting semidefinite programming approaches and corresponding computational times.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Globally Optimal Boresight Alignment of UAV-LiDAR Systems

In airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR) systems, misalignments between the LiDAR-scanner and the inertial navigation system (INS) mounted on an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)'s frame can lead to inaccurate 3D point clouds. Determining the orientation offset, or boresight error is key to many LiDAR-based applications. In this work, we introduce a mixed-integer quadratically constrained quadratic program (MIQCQP) that can globally solve this misalignment problem. We also propose a nested spatial branch and bound (nsBB) algorithm that improves computational performance. The nsBB relies on novel preprocessing steps that progressively reduce the problem size. In addition, an adaptive grid search (aGS) allowing us to obtain quick heuristic solutions is presented. Our algorithms are open-source, multi-threaded and multi-machine compatible.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Network Flow and Copper Plate Relaxations for AC Transmission Systems

Nonlinear convex relaxations of the power flow equations and, in particular, the Semi-Definite Programming (SDP), Convex Quadratic (QC), and Second-Order Cone (SOC) relaxations, have attracted significant interest in recent years. Thus far, little attention has been given to simpler linear relaxations of the power flow equations, which may bring significant performance gains at the cost of model accuracy. To fill the gap, this paper develops two intuitive linear relaxations of the power flow equations, one based on classic network flow models (NF) and another inspired by copper plate approximations (CP). Theoretical results show that the proposed NF model is a relaxation of the established nonlinear SOC model and the CP model is a relaxation of the NF model. Consequently, considering the linear NF and CP relaxations alongside the established nonlinear relaxations (SDP, QC, SOC) provides a rich variety of tradeoffs between the relaxation accuracy and performance.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

The QC Relaxation: Theoretical and Computational Results on Optimal Power Flow

Convex relaxations of the power flow equations and, in particular, the Semi-Definite Programming (SDP) and Second-Order Cone (SOC) relaxations, have attracted significant interest in recent years. The Quadratic Convex (QC) relaxation is a departure from these relaxations in the sense that it imposes constraints to preserve stronger links between the voltage variables through convex envelopes of the polar representation. This paper is a systematic study of the QC relaxation for AC Optimal Power Flow with realistic side constraints. The main theoretical result shows that the QC relaxation is stronger than the SOC relaxation and neither dominates nor is dominated by the SDP relaxation. In addition, comprehensive computational results show that the QC relaxation may produce significant improvements in accuracy over the SOC relaxation at a reasonable computational cost, especially for networks with tight bounds on phase angle differences. The QC and SOC relaxations are also shown to be significantly faster and reliable compared to the SDP relaxation given the current state of the respective solvers.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access