Source author record

Hao-Yi Wan

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

4works
4topics
4close collaborators

Published work

4 publications

preprint2018arXiv

Testing backreaction effects with observational Hubble parameter data

In order to explore the generic properties of a backreaction model for explaining the accelerated expansion of the Universe, we exploit two metrics to describe the late time Universe. Since the standard FLRW metric cannot precisely describe the late time Universe on small scales, the template metric with an evolving curvature parameter κD(t)κ_{\mathcal{D}}(t) is employed. However, we doubt the validity of the prescription for κDκ_{\mathcal{D}}, which motivates us apply observational Hubble parameter data (OHD) to constrain parameters in dust cosmology. First, for FLRW metric, by getting best-fit constraints of ΩmD0=0.25−0.03+0.03Ω^{\mathcal{D}_0}_m = 0.25^{+0.03}_{-0.03}, n=0.02−0.66+0.69n = 0.02^{+0.69}_{-0.66}, and HD0=70.54−3.97+4.24 km s−1 Mpc−1H_{\mathcal{D}_0} = 70.54^{+4.24}_{-3.97}\ {\rm km \ s^{-1} \ Mpc^{-1}}, the evolutions of parameters are explored. Second, in template metric context, by marginalizing over HD0H_{\mathcal{D}_0} as a prior of uniform distribution, we obtain the best-fit values of n=−1.22−0.41+0.68n=-1.22^{+0.68}_{-0.41} and ΩmD0=0.12−0.02+0.04{Ω_{m}^{\mathcal{D}_{0}}}=0.12^{+0.04}_{-0.02}. Moreover, we utilize three different Gaussian priors of HD0H_{\mathcal{D}_0}, which result in different best-fits of nn, but almost the same best-fit value of ΩmD0∼0.12{Ω_{m}^{\mathcal{D}_{0}}}\sim0.12. Also, the absolute constraints without marginalization of parameter are obtained: n=−1.1−0.50+0.58n=-1.1^{+0.58}_{-0.50} and ΩmD0=0.13±0.03{Ω_{m}^{\mathcal{D}_{0}}}=0.13\pm0.03. With these constraints, the evolutions of the effective deceleration parameter qDq^{\mathcal{D}} indicate that the backreaction can account for the accelerated expansion of the Universe without involving extra dark energy component in the scaling solution context. Nevertheless, the results also verify that the prescription of κDκ_{\mathcal{D}} is insufficient and should be improved.

preprint2010arXiv

Constraints on smoothness parameter and dark energy using observational H(z)H(z) data

The universe, with large-scale homogeneity, is locally inhomogeneous, clustering into stars, galaxies and larger structures. Such property is described by the smoothness parameter αα which is defined as the proportion of matter in the form of intergalactic medium. If we take consideration of the inhomogeneities in small scale, there should be modifications of the cosmological distances compared to a homogenous model. Dyer and Roeder developed a second-order ordinary differential equation (D-R equation) that describes the angular diameter distance-redshift relation for inhomogeneous cosmological models. Furthermore, we may obtain the D-R equation for observational H(z)H(z) data (OHD). The density-parameter ΩMΩ_{\rm M}, the state of dark energy ωω, and the smoothness-parameter αα are constrained by a set of OHD in a spatially flat ΛΛCDM universe as well as a spatially flat XCDM universe. By using of χ2χ^2 minimization method we get α=0.81−0.20+0.19α=0.81^{+0.19}_{-0.20} and ΩM=0.32−0.06+0.12Ω_{\rm M}=0.32^{+0.12}_{-0.06} at 1σ1σ confidence level. If we assume a Gaussian prior of ΩM=0.26±0.1Ω_{\rm M}=0.26\pm0.1, we get α=0.93−0.19+0.07α=0.93^{+0.07}_{-0.19} and ΩM=0.31−0.05+0.06Ω_{\rm M}=0.31^{+0.06}_{-0.05}. For XCDM model, αα is constrained to α≥0.80α\geq0.80 but ωω is weakly constrained around -1, where ωω describes the equation of the state of the dark energy (pX=ωρXp_{\rm X}=ωρ_{\rm X}). We conclude that OHD constrains the smoothness parameter more effectively than the data of SNe Ia and compact radio sources.

preprint2010arXiv

Cosmological constraints from Radial Baryon Acoustic Oscillation measurements and Observational Hubble data

We use the Radial Baryon Acoustic Oscillation (RBAO) measurements, distant type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia), the observational H(z)H(z) data (OHD) and the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) shift parameter data to constrain cosmological parameters of ΛΛCDM and XCDM cosmologies and further examine the role of OHD and SNe Ia data in cosmological constraints. We marginalize the likelihood function over hh by integrating the probability density P∝e−χ2/2P\propto e^{-χ^{2}/2} to obtain the best fitting results and the confidence regions in the Ωm−ΩΛΩ_{m}-Ω_Λ plane.With the combination analysis for both of the {\rm ΛΛ}CDM and XCDM models, we find that the confidence regions of 68.3%, 95.4% and 99.7% levels using OHD+RBAO+CMB data are in good agreement with that of SNe Ia+RBAO+CMB data which is consistent with the result of Lin et al's work. With more data of OHD, we can probably constrain the cosmological parameters using OHD data instead of SNe Ia data in the future.

preprint2010arXiv

Cosmological Constraints on the Undulant Universe

We use the redshift Hubble parameter H(z)H(z) data derived from relative galaxy ages, distant type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia), the Baryonic Acoustic Oscillation (BAO) peak, and the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) shift parameter data, to constrain cosmological parameters in the Undulant Universe. We marginalize the likelihood functions over hh by integrating the probability density P∝e−χ2/2P\propto e^{-χ^2/2}. By using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) technique, we obtain the best fitting results and give the confidence regions on the b−Ωm0b-Ω_{\rm m0} plane. Then we compare their constraints. Our results show that the H(z)H(z) data play a similar role with the SNe Ia data in cosmological study. By presenting the independent and joint constraints, we find that the BAO and CMB data play very important roles in breaking the degeneracy compared with the H(z)H(z) and SNe Ia data alone. Combined with the BAO or CMB data, one can improve the constraints remarkably. The SNe Ia data sets constrain Ωm0Ω_{\rm m0} much tighter than the H(z)H(z) data sets, but the H(z)H(z) data sets constrain bb much tighter than the SNe Ia data sets. All these results show that the Undulant Universe approaches the ΛΛ\rmCDM model. We expect more H(z)H(z) data to constrain cosmological parameters in future.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.