Source author record

Hans-Erich Fröhlich

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

2works
4topics
3close collaborators

Published work

2 publications

preprint2015arXiv

A Bayesian estimation of the helioseismic solar age

The helioseismic determination of the solar age has been a subject of several studies because it provides us with an independent estimation of the age of the solar system. We present the Bayesian estimates of the helioseismic age of the Sun, which are determined by means of calibrated solar models that employ different equations of state and nuclear reaction rates. We use 17 frequency separation ratios r02(n)=(νn,l=0−νn−1,l=2)/(νn,l=1−νn−1,l=1)r_{02}(n)=(ν_{n,l=0}-ν_{n-1,l=2})/(ν_{n,l=1}-ν_{n-1,l=1}) from 8640 days of low-ℓ\ell BiSON frequencies and consider three likelihood functions that depend on the handling of the errors of these r02(n)r_{02}(n) ratios. Moreover, we employ the 2010 CODATA recommended values for Newton's constant, solar mass, and radius to calibrate a large grid of solar models spanning a conceivable range of solar ages. It is shown that the most constrained posterior distribution of the solar age for models employing Irwin EOS with NACRE reaction rates leads to t⊙=4.587±0.007t_\odot = 4.587 \pm 0.007 Gyr, while models employing the Irwin EOS and Adelberger, et al., Reviews of Modern Physics, 83, 195 (2011) reaction rate have t⊙=4.569±0.006t_\odot = 4.569 \pm 0.006 Gyr. Implementing OPAL EOS in the solar models results in reduced evidence ratios (Bayes factors) and leads to an age that is not consistent with the meteoritic dating of the solar system. An estimate of the solar age that relies on an helioseismic age indicator such as r02(n)r_{02}(n) turns out to be essentially independent of the type of likelihood function. However, with respect to model selection, abandoning any information concerning the errors of the r02(n)r_{02}(n) ratios leads to inconclusive results, and this stresses the importance of evaluating the trustworthiness of error estimates.

preprint2011arXiv

Estimating meteor rates using Bayesian inference

A method for estimating the true meteor rate λ from a small number of observed meteors n is derived. We employ Bayesian inference with a Poissonian likelihood function. We discuss the choice of a suitable prior and propose the adoption of Jeffreys prior, P(λ)=λ^{-0.5}, which yields an expectation value E(λ) = n+0.5 for any n \geq 0. We update the ZHR meteor activity formula accordingly, and explain how 68%- and 95%-confidence intervals can be computed.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.