Researcher profile

Hakop Pashayan

Hakop Pashayan contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Fast estimation of outcome probabilities for quantum circuits

We present two classical algorithms for the simulation of universal quantum circuits on $n$ qubits constructed from $c$ instances of Clifford gates and $t$ arbitrary-angle $Z$-rotation gates such as $T$ gates. Our algorithms complement each other by performing best in different parameter regimes. The $\tt{Estimate}$ algorithm produces an additive precision estimate of the Born rule probability of a chosen measurement outcome with the only source of run-time inefficiency being a linear dependence on the stabilizer extent (which scales like $\approx 1.17^t$ for $T$ gates). Our algorithm is state-of-the-art for this task: as an example, in approximately $13$ hours (on a standard desktop computer), we estimated the Born rule probability to within an additive error of $0.03$, for a $50$-qubit, $60$ non-Clifford gate quantum circuit with more than $2000$ Clifford gates. Our second algorithm, $\tt{Compute}$, calculates the probability of a chosen measurement outcome to machine precision with run-time $O(2^{t-r} t)$ where $r$ is an efficiently computable, circuit-specific quantity. With high probability, $r$ is very close to $\min \{t, n-w\}$ for random circuits with many Clifford gates, where $w$ is the number of measured qubits. $\tt{Compute}$ can be effective in surprisingly challenging parameter regimes, e.g., we can randomly sample Clifford+$T$ circuits with $n=55$, $w=5$, $c=10^5$ and $t=80$ $T$ gates, and then compute the Born rule probability with a run-time consistently less than $10$ minutes using a single core of a standard desktop computer. We provide a C+Python implementation of our algorithms and benchmark them using random circuits, the hidden shift algorithm and the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA).

preprint2020arXiv

From estimation of quantum probabilities to simulation of quantum circuits

Investigating the classical simulability of quantum circuits provides a promising avenue towards understanding the computational power of quantum systems. Whether a class of quantum circuits can be efficiently simulated with a probabilistic classical computer, or is provably hard to simulate, depends quite critically on the precise notion of "classical simulation" and in particular on the required accuracy. We argue that a notion of classical simulation, which we call epsilon-simulation, captures the essence of possessing "equivalent computational power" as the quantum system it simulates: It is statistically impossible to distinguish an agent with access to an epsilon-simulator from one possessing the simulated quantum system. We relate epsilon-simulation to various alternative notions of simulation predominantly focusing on a simulator we call a poly-box. A poly-box outputs 1/poly precision additive estimates of Born probabilities and marginals. This notion of simulation has gained prominence through a number of recent simulability results. Accepting some plausible computational theoretic assumptions, we show that epsilon-simulation is strictly stronger than a poly-box by showing that IQP circuits and unconditioned magic-state injected Clifford circuits are both hard to epsilon-simulate and yet admit a poly-box. In contrast, we also show that these two notions are equivalent under an additional assumption on the sparsity of the output distribution (poly-sparsity).