BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Haakon Bakka

Haakon Bakka contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
MethodologyComputation

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

How to solve the stochastic partial differential equation that gives a Matérn random field using the finite element method

This tutorial teaches parts of the finite element method (FEM), and solves a stochastic partial differential equation (SPDE). The contents herein are considered "known" in the numerics literature, but for statisticians it is very difficult to find a resource for learning these ideas in a timely manner (without doing a year's worth of courses in numerics). The goal of this tutorial is to be pedagogical and explain the computations/theory to a statistician. This is not a practical tutorial, there is little computer code, and no data analysis.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

A principled distance-based prior for the shape of the Weibull model

The use of flat or weakly informative priors is popular due to the objective a priori belief in the absence of strong prior information. In the case of the Weibull model the improper uniform, equal parameter gamma and joint Jeffrey's priors for the shape parameter are popular choices. The effects and behaviors of these priors have yet to be established from a modeling viewpoint, especially their ability to reduce to the simpler exponential model. In this work we propose a new principled prior for the shape parameter of the Weibull model, originating from a prior on the distance function, and advocate this new prior as a principled choice in the absence of strong prior information. This new prior can then be used in models with a Weibull modeling component, like competing risks, joint and spatial models, to mention a few. This prior is available in the R-INLA for use, and is applied in a joint longitudinal-survival model framework using the INLA method.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

High-resolution Bayesian mapping of landslide hazard with unobserved trigger event

Statistical models for landslide hazard enable mapping of risk factors and landslide occurrence intensity by using geomorphological covariates available at high spatial resolution. However, the spatial distribution of the triggering event (e.g., precipitation or earthquakes) is often not directly observed. In this paper, we develop Bayesian spatial hierarchical models for point patterns of landslide occurrences using different types of log-Gaussian Cox processes. Starting from a competitive baseline model that captures the unobserved precipitation trigger through a spatial random effect at slope unit resolution, we explore novel complex model structures that take clusters of events arising at small spatial scales into account, as well as nonlinear or spatially-varying covariate effects. For a 2009 event of around 4000 precipitation-triggered landslides in Sicily, Italy, we show how to fit our proposed models efficiently using the integrated nested Laplace approximation (INLA), and rigorously compare the performance of our models both from a statistical and applied perspective. In this context, we argue that model comparison should not be based on a single criterion, and that different models of various complexity may provide insights into complementary aspects of the same applied problem. In our application, our models are found to have mostly the same spatial predictive performance, implying that key to successful prediction is the inclusion of a slope-unit resolved random effect capturing the precipitation trigger. Interestingly, a parsimonious formulation of space-varying slope effects reflects a physical interpretation of the precipitation trigger: in subareas with weak trigger, the slope steepness is shown to be mostly irrelevant.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Max-and-Smooth: a two-step approach for approximate Bayesian inference in latent Gaussian models

With modern high-dimensional data, complex statistical models are necessary, requiring computationally feasible inference schemes. We introduce Max-and-Smooth, an approximate Bayesian inference scheme for a flexible class of latent Gaussian models (LGMs) where one or more of the likelihood parameters are modeled by latent additive Gaussian processes. Max-and-Smooth consists of two-steps. In the first step (Max), the likelihood function is approximated by a Gaussian density with mean and covariance equal to either (a) the maximum likelihood estimate and the inverse observed information, respectively, or (b) the mean and covariance of the normalized likelihood function. In the second step (Smooth), the latent parameters and hyperparameters are inferred and smoothed with the approximated likelihood function. The proposed method ensures that the uncertainty from the first step is correctly propagated to the second step. Since the approximated likelihood function is Gaussian, the approximate posterior density of the latent parameters of the LGM (conditional on the hyperparameters) is also Gaussian, thus facilitating efficient posterior inference in high dimensions. Furthermore, the approximate marginal posterior distribution of the hyperparameters is tractable, and as a result, the hyperparameters can be sampled independently of the latent parameters. In the case of a large number of independent data replicates, sparse precision matrices, and high-dimensional latent vectors, the speedup is substantial in comparison to an MCMC scheme that infers the posterior density from the exact likelihood function. The proposed inference scheme is demonstrated on one spatially referenced real dataset and on simulated data mimicking spatial, temporal, and spatio-temporal inference problems. Our results show that Max-and-Smooth is accurate and fast.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access