Source author record

H. Grawe

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

2works
2topics
4close collaborators

Published work

2 publications

preprint2020arXiv

Decay Spectroscopy of 129^{129}Cd

Excited states of 129^{129}In populated following the ββ-decay of 129^{129}Cd were experimentally studied with the GRIFFIN spectrometer at the ISAC facility of TRIUMF, Canada. A 480-MeV proton beam was impinged on a uranium carbide target and 129^{129}Cd was extracted using the Ion Guide Laser Ion Source (IG-LIS). ββ- and γγ-rays following the decay of 129^{129}Cd were detected with the GRIFFIN spectrometer comprising the plastic scintillator SCEPTAR and 16 high-purity germanium (HPGe) clover-type detectors. %, along with the ββ-particles were detected with SCEPTAR. From the ββ-γγ-γγ coincidence analysis, 32 new transitions and 7 new excited states were established, expanding the previously known level scheme of 129^{129}In. The log⁡ft\log ft values deduced from the ββ-feeding intensities suggest that some of the high-lying states were populated by the ν0g7/2→π0g9/2ν0 g_{7/2} \rightarrow π0 g_{9/2} allowed Gamow-Teller (GT) transition, which indicates that the allowed GT transition is more dominant in the 129^{129}Cd decay than previously reported. Observation of fragmented Gamow-Teller strengths is consistent with theoretical calculations.

preprint2010arXiv

Comment on "Reviewing the evidence for two-proton emission from the high-spin isomer in 94^{94}Ag"

A recent publication [D.G. Jenkins, Phys. Rev. C \textbf{80}, 054303 (2009)] claims to discredit the experimental observation of two-proton decay of the (21+^+) high-spin isomer in 94^{94}Ag [I. Mukha \emph{et al.,} Nature (London) \textbf{439}, 298 (2006)]. Its conclusion, which would require a reestablishment of the two-proton emission, is made on the basis of unwarranted assumptions by Jenkins concerning the data analysis of the original work. We provide proof that these assumptions do not correspond to reality, and that therefore the conclusion of the paper is misleading.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.