Researcher profile

H. B. F. Nielsen

H. B. F. Nielsen contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

hep-ph hep-th astro-ph.CO

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - Baseline

5works

0followers

3topics

3close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2016arXiv

Degrees of freedom of massless boson and fermion fields in any even dimension

This is a discussion on degrees of freedom of massless fermion and boson fields, if they are free or weakly interacting. We generalize the gauge fields of $S^{ab}$ - $ω_{abc}$ - and of $\tilde{S}^{ab}$ - $ \tildeω_{abc}$ - of the spin-charge-family to the gauge fields of all possible products of $γ^a$'s and of all possible products of $\tildeγ^a$'s, the first taking care in the {\it spin-charge-family} theory of the spins and charges quantum numbers ($τ^{Ai}=\sum_{a,b} c^{Ai}{}_{ab} \,S^{ab}$) of fermions, the second ($\tildeτ^{Ai}= \sum_{a,b} \tilde{c}^{Ai}{}_{ab}\, \tilde{S}^{ab}$) taking care of the families quantum numbers.

preprint2016arXiv

Fermionization in an Arbitrary Number of Dimensions

One purpose of this proceedings-contribution is to show that at least for free massless particles it is possible to construct an explicit boson theory which is exactly equivalent in terms of momenta and energy to a fermion theory. The fermions come as $2^{d/2-1}$ families and the to this whole system of fermions corresponding bosons come as a whole series of the Kalb-Ramond fields, one set of components for each number of indexes on the tensor fields. Since Kalb-Ramond fields naturally (only) couple to the extended objects or branes, we suspect that inclusion of interaction into such for a bosonization prepared system - except for the lowest dimensions - without including branes or something like that is not likely to be possible. The need for the families is easily seen just by using the theorem long ago put forward by Aratyn and one of us (H.B.F.N.), which says that to have the statistical mechanics of the fermion system and the boson system to match one needs to have the number of the field components in the ratio $\frac{2^{d-1}-1}{2^{d-1}}= \frac{\# bosons}{\# fermions}$, enforcing that the number of fermion components must be a multiple of $2^{d-1}$, where $d$ is the space-time dimension. This "explanation" of the number of dimension is potentially useful for the explanation for the number of dimension put forward by one of us (S.N.M.B.) since long in the spin-charge-family theory, and leads like the latter to typically (a multiple of) $4$ families. And this is the second purpose for our work on the fermionization in an arbitrary number of dimensions - namely to learn how "natural" is the inclusion of the families in the way the spin-charge-family theory does.

preprint2014arXiv

Discrete symmetries in the Kaluza-Klein-like theories

In theories of the Kaluza-Klein kind there are spins or total angular moments in higher dimensions which manifest as charges in the observable $d=(3+1)$. The charge conjugation requirement, if following the prescription in ($3+1$), would transform any particle state out of the Dirac sea into the hole in the Dirac sea, which manifests as an anti-particle having all the spin degrees of freedom in $d$, except $S^{03}$, the same as the corresponding particle state. This is in contradiction with what we observe for the anti-particle. In this paper we redefine the discrete symmetries so that we stay within the subgroups of the starting group of symmetries, while we require that the angular moments in higher dimensions manifest as charges in $d=(3+1)$. We pay attention on spaces with even $d$.

preprint2014arXiv

Proceedings to the 14th International Workshop "What Comes Beyond the Standard Models", July 11-21, 2011, Bled, Slovenia

The contribution contains the preface to the Proceedings to the 14th Workshop What Comes Beyond the Standard Models, Bled, July 11 - 21, 2011, published in Bled workshops in physics, Vol.12, No. 2, DMFA-Zaloznistvo, Ljubljana, Dec. 2011, and links to the published contributions.

preprint2014arXiv

Small Representation Principle

In a previous article Don Bennett and I looked for, found and proposed a game in which the Standard Model Gauge Group $S(U(2) \times U(3))$ gets singled out as the "winner". This "game" means that the by Nature chosen gauge group should be just that one, which has the maximal value for a quantity, which is a modification of the ratio of the quadratic Casimir for the adjoint representation and that for a "smallest" faithful representation. In a recent article I proposed to extend this "game" to construct a corresponding game between different potential dimensions for space-time. The idea is to formulate, how the same competition as the one between the potential gauge groups would run out, if restricted to the potential Lorentz or Poincare groups achievable for different dimensions of space-time $d$. The remarkable point is, that it is the experimental space-time dimension 4, which wins. It follows that the whole Standard Model is specified by requiring SMALLEST REPRESENTATIONS! Speculatively we even argue that our principle found suggests the group of gauge transformations and some manifold(suggestive of say general relativity).

Institution

Affiliation not imported yet

This author record came from a source that does not expose affiliation metadata. Once the author claims the profile or we enrich the record from another provider, this section will link to the concrete institution.

Topic footprint