BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Guillem Pratx

Guillem Pratx contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
physics.med-ph

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Critical Shortfall in NIH Support for Medical Physics Research

This report summarizes changes in federal research funding to the medical physics community between FY24 and FY25. By linking the AAPM membership database with NIH RePORTER records, we quantified the distribution of NIH funding for projects led by AAPM researchers. Although total NIH funding to AAPM members remained relatively stable across the two years, the composition of that funding shifted substantially. Competing (new and renewal) awards declined 50%, driven largely by an 80% collapse in new R01 grants from the National Cancer Institute (NCI). In contrast, noncompeting continuation awards increased by 10%, following a shift in how NIH funds multi-year projects. These changes occurred in the context of widespread disruptions to NIH review and grantmaking, including delayed study sections and more stringent administrative requirements. Federal funding is essential to sustaining innovation, supporting early-stage investigators, and ensuring that patients receive the best possible care. The trends identified here raise concerns about the long-term vitality and stability of the medical physics research pipeline.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Patient-specific mean teacher UNet for enhancing PET image and low-dose PET reconstruction on RefleXion X1 biology-guided radiotherapy system

The RefleXion X1 is the first biology-guided radiotherapy (BgRT) system. Its dual 90-degree PET detector collects fewer pair production events compared to a full-ring diagnostic PET system. In the proposed BgRT workflow, a short scan is acquired before treatment delivery to ensure image quality and consistency. The shorter scan time, a quarter of the simulation scan time, also leads to fewer coincidence events and hence reduced image quality. In this study, we proposed a patient-specific mean teacher UNet (MT-UNet) to enhance PET image quality and low-dose PET reconstruction on RefleXion X1. PET/CT scans of nine cancer patients were acquired using RefleXion X1. Every patient had one simulation scan. Five patients had additional scans acquired during the first and the final treatment fractions. Treatment scans were acquired using the same imaging protocol as the simulation scan. For each scan, we reconstructed a full-dose image and evenly split coincidence events into four sessions to reconstruct four quarter-dose PET images. For each patient, our proposed MT-UNet was trained using quarter-dose and full-dose images of the simulation scan. For the image quality enhancement task, we applied nine trained MT-UNets to full-dose simulation PET images of the nine patients to generate enhanced images, respectively. The enhanced images were compared with the original full-dose images using CNR and SNR. For the low-dose image reconstruction task, we applied five trained MT-UNets to ten quarter-dose treatment images of five patients to predict full-dose images, respectively. The predicted and ground truth full-dose images were compared using SSIM and PSNR. We also trained and evaluated patient-specific UNets for model comparison. Our proposed patient-specific MT-UNet achieved better performance in improving the quality of RefleXion low-dose and full-dose images compared to the patient-specific UNet.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access