Source author record

Guangzhi Chen

Guangzhi Chen appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Towards the Development of A Three-Dimensional SBP-SAT FDTD Method: Theory and Validation

To enhance the scalability and performance of the traditional finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) methods, a three-dimensional summation-by-parts simultaneous approximation term (SBP-SAT) FDTD method is developed to solve complex electromagnetic problems. It is theoretically stable and can be further used for multiple mesh blocks with different mesh sizes. This paper mainly focuses on the fundamental theoretical aspects upon its three-dimensional implementation, the SAT for various boundary conditions, and the numerical dispersion properties and the comparison with the FDTD method. The proposed SBP-SAT FDTD method inherits all the merits of the FDTD method, which is matrix-free, easy to implement, and has the same level of accuracy with a negligible overhead of runtime (0.13\%) and memory usage (1.2\%). Four numerical examples are carried out to validate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

preprint2020arXiv

Investigation of Numerical Dispersion with Time Step of The FDTD Methods: Avoiding Erroneous Conclusions

It is widely thought that small time steps lead to small numerical errors in the finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) simulations. In this paper, we investigated how time steps impact on numerical dispersion of two FDTD methods including the FDTD(2,2) method and the FDTD(2,4) method. Through rigorously analytical and numerical analysis, it is found that small time steps of the FDTD methods do not always have small numerical errors. Our findings reveal that these two FDTD methods present different behaviors with respect to time steps: (1) for the FDTD(2,2) method, smaller time steps limited by the Courant-Friedrichs-Lewy (CFL) condition increase numerical dispersion and lead to larger simulation errors; (2) for the FDTD(2,4) method, as time step increases, numerical dispersion errors first decrease and then increase. Our findings are also comprehensively validated from one- to three-dimensional cases through several numerical examples including wave propagation, resonant frequencies of cavities and a practical electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) problem.