Source author record

Guangqiang Yin

Guangqiang Yin appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Triplet Online Instance Matching Loss for Person Re-identification

Mining the shared features of same identity in different scene, and the unique features of different identity in same scene, are most significant challenges in the field of person re-identification (ReID). Online Instance Matching (OIM) loss function and Triplet loss function are main methods for person ReID. Unfortunately, both of them have drawbacks. OIM loss treats all samples equally and puts no emphasis on hard samples. Triplet loss processes batch construction in a complicated and fussy way and converges slowly. For these problems, we propose a Triplet Online Instance Matching (TOIM) loss function, which lays emphasis on the hard samples and improves the accuracy of person ReID effectively. It combines the advantages of OIM loss and Triplet loss and simplifies the process of batch construction, which leads to a more rapid convergence. It can be trained on-line when handle the joint detection and identification task. To validate our loss function, we collect and annotate a large-scale benchmark dataset (UESTC-PR) based on images taken from surveillance cameras, which contains 499 identities and 60,437 images. We evaluated our proposed loss function on Duke, Marker-1501 and UESTC-PR using ResNet-50, and the result shows that our proposed loss function outperforms the baseline methods by a maximum of 21.7%, including Softmax loss, OIM loss and Triplet loss.