BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Gregory R. Conner

Gregory R. Conner appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
math.ATmath.DSmath.GT

Catalog footprint

What is connected

4works
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

General theory of lifting spaces

In his classical textbook on algebraic topology Edwin Spanier developed the theory of covering spaces within a more general framework of lifting spaces (i.e., Hurewicz fibrations with unique path-lifting property). Among other, Spanier proved that for every space $X$ there exists a universal lifting space, which however need not be simply connected, unless the base space $X$ is semi-locally simply connected. The question on what exactly is the fundamental group of the universal space was left unanswered. The main source of lifting spaces are inverse limits of covering spaces over $X$, or more generally, over some inverse system of spaces converging to $X$. Every metric space $X$ can be obtained as a limit of an inverse system of polyhedra, and so inverse limits of covering spaces over the system yield lifting spaces over $X$. They are related to the geometry (in particular the fundamental group) of $X$ in a similar way as the covering spaces over polyhedra are related to the fundamental group of their base. Thus lifting spaces appear as a natural replacement for the concept of covering spaces over base spaces with bad local properties. In this paper we develop a general theory of lifting spaces and prove that they are preserved by products, inverse limits and other important constructions. We show that maps from $X$ to polyhedra give rise to coverings over $X$ and use that to prove that for a connected, locally path connected and paracompact $X$, the fundamental group of the above-mentioned Spanier's universal space is precisely the intersection of all Spanier groups associated to open covers of $X$, and that the later coincides with the shape kernel of $X$. Furthermore, we examine in more detail lifting spaces over $X$ that arise as inverse limits of coverings over some approximations of $X$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Self-affine Manifolds

This paper studies closed 3-manifolds which are the attractors of a system of finitely many affine contractions that tile $\mathbb{R}^3$. Such attractors are called self-affine tiles. Effective characterization and recognition theorems for these 3-manifolds as well as theoretical generalizations of these results to higher dimensions are established. The methods developed build a bridge linking geometric topology with iterated function systems and their attractors. A method to model self-affine tiles by simple iterative systems is developed in order to study their topology. The model is functorial in the sense that there is an easily computable map that induces isomorphisms between the natural subdivisions of the attractor of the model and the self-affine tile. It has many beneficial qualities including ease of computation allowing one to determine topological properties of the attractor of the model such as connectedness and whether it is a manifold. The induced map between the attractor of the model and the self-affine tile is a quotient map and can be checked in certain cases to be monotone or cell-like. Deep theorems from geometric topology are applied to characterize and develop algorithms to recognize when a self-affine tile is a topological or generalized manifold in all dimensions. These new tools are used to check that several self-affine tiles in the literature are 3-balls. An example of a wild 3-dimensional self-affine tile is given whose boundary is a topological 2-sphere but which is not itself a 3-ball. The paper describes how any 3-dimensional handlebody can be given the structure of a self-affine 3-manifold. It is conjectured that every self-affine tile which is a manifold is a handlebody.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Archipelago groups

The classical archipelago is a non-contractible subset of $\mathbb{R}^3$ which is homeomorphic to a disk except at one non-manifold point. Its fundamental group, $\mathcal{A}$, is the quotient of the topologist's product of $\mathbb Z$, the fundamental group of the shrinking wedge of countably many copies of the circle (the Hawaiian earring), modulo the corresponding free product. We show $\mathcal{A}$ is locally free, not indicable, and has the rationals both as a subgroup and a quotient group. Replacing $\mathbb Z$ with arbitrary groups yields the notion of archipelago groups. Surprisingly, every archipelago of countable groups is isomorphic to either $\mathcal{A}(\mathbb Z)$ or $\mathcal{A}(\mathbb Z_2)$, the cases where the archipelago is built from circles or projective planes respectively. We conjecture that these two groups are isomorphic and prove that for large enough cardinalities of $G_i$, $\mathcal{A}(G_i)$ is not isomorphic to either.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Ends of iterated function systems

Guided by classical concepts, we define the notion of \emph{ends} of an iterated function system and prove that the number of ends is an upper bound for the number of nondegenerate components of its attractor. The remaining isolated points are then linked to idempotent maps. A commutative diagram illustrates the natural relationships between the infinite walks in a semigroup and components of an attractor in more detail. We show in particular that, if an iterated function system is one-ended, the associated attractor is connected, and ask whether every connected attractor (fractal) conversely admits a one-ended system.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access