BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Gopalan Nadathur

Gopalan Nadathur contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Logic in Computer ScienceProgramming Languages

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
7works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

7 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A Logic for Reasoning About LF Specifications

We present a logic named L_{LF} whose intended use is to formalize properties of specifications developed in the dependently typed lambda calculus LF. The logic is parameterized by the LF signature that constitutes the specification. Atomic formulas correspond to typing derivations relative to this signature. The logic includes a collection of propositional connectives and quantifiers. Quantification ranges over expressions that denote LF terms and LF contexts. Quantifiers of the first variety are qualified by simple types that describe the functional structure associated with the variables they bind; deeper, dependency related properties are expressed by the body of the formula. Context-level quantifiers are qualified by context schemas that identify patterns of declarations out of which actual contexts may be constructed. The semantics of variable-free atomic formulas is articulated via the derivability in LF of the judgements they encode. Propositional constants and connectives are understood in the usual manner and the meaning of quantifiers is explicated through substitutions of expressions that adhere to the type qualifications. The logic is complemented by a proof system that enables reasoning that is sound with respect to the described semantics. The main novelties of the proof system are the provision for case-analysis style reasoning about LF judgements, support for inductive reasoning over the heights of LF derivations and the encoding of LF meta-theorems. The logic is motivated by the paradigmatic example of type assignment in the simply-typed lambda calculus and the proof system is illustrated through the formalization of a proof of type uniqueness for this calculus.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Combining Deduction Modulo and Logics of Fixed-Point Definitions

Inductive and coinductive specifications are widely used in formalizing computational systems. Such specifications have a natural rendition in logics that support fixed-point definitions. Another useful formalization device is that of recursive specifications. These specifications are not directly complemented by fixed-point reasoning techniques and, correspondingly, do not have to satisfy strong monotonicity restrictions. We show how to incorporate a rewriting capability into logics of fixed-point definitions towards additionally supporting recursive specifications. In particular, we describe a natural deduction calculus that adds a form of "closed-world" equality - a key ingredient to supporting fixed-point definitions - to deduction modulo, a framework for extending a logic with a rewriting layer operating on formulas. We show that our calculus enjoys strong normalizability when the rewrite system satisfies general properties and we demonstrate its usefulness in specifying and reasoning about syntax-based descriptions. The integration of closed-world equality into deduction modulo leads us to reconfigure the elimination principle for this form of equality in a way that, for the first time, resolves issues regarding the stability of finite proofs under reduction.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Proceedings Sixth International Workshop on Logical Frameworks and Meta-languages: Theory and Practice

This volume constitutes the proceedings of LFMTP 2011, the Sixth International Workshop on Logical Frameworks and Meta-languages: Theory and Practice. The LFMTP workshop series brings together designers, implementors, and practitioners to discuss varied aspects of the structure of logical frameworks and meta-languages that impinge on their use in representing, implementing, and reasoning about a wide variety of deductive systems of interest in logic and computer science. LFMTP 2011 was held on August 26, 2011 in Nijmegen, Netherlands, as a workshop associated with ITP 2011, the Second International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving. Its program consisted of contributed and invited presentations and was integrated with that of MLPA 11, the Third Workshop on Modules and Libraries for Proof Assistants. This proceedings contains only the contributed papers that were accepted for presentation at the workshop. Each of these papers was accepted based on the reviews of three members of the program committee. Authors were subsequently given the opportunity to revise their submissions based on the comments provided by the reviewers and the feedback obtained during their presentations at the workshop.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

A Meta-Programming Approach to Realizing Dependently Typed Logic Programming

Dependently typed lambda calculi such as the Logical Framework (LF) can encode relationships between terms in types and can naturally capture correspondences between formulas and their proofs. Such calculi can also be given a logic programming interpretation: the Twelf system is based on such an interpretation of LF. We consider here whether a conventional logic programming language can provide the benefits of a Twelf-like system for encoding type and proof-and-formula dependencies. In particular, we present a simple mapping from LF specifications to a set of formulas in the higher-order hereditary Harrop (hohh) language, that relates derivations and proof-search between the two frameworks. We then show that this encoding can be improved by exploiting knowledge of the well-formedness of the original LF specifications to elide much redundant type-checking information. The resulting logic program has a structure that closely resembles the original specification, thereby allowing LF specifications to be viewed as hohh meta-programs. Using the Teyjus implementation of lambdaProlog, we show that our translation provides an efficient means for executing LF specifications, complementing the ability that the Twelf system provides for reasoning about them.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

A two-level logic approach to reasoning about computations

Relational descriptions have been used in formalizing diverse computational notions, including, for example, operational semantics, typing, and acceptance by non-deterministic machines. We therefore propose a (restricted) logical theory over relations as a language for specifying such notions. Our specification logic is further characterized by an ability to explicitly treat binding in object languages. Once such a logic is fixed, a natural next question is how we might prove theorems about specifications written in it. We propose to use a second logic, called a reasoning logic, for this purpose. A satisfactory reasoning logic should be able to completely encode the specification logic. Associated with the specification logic are various notions of binding: for quantifiers within formulas, for eigenvariables within sequents, and for abstractions within terms. To provide a natural treatment of these aspects, the reasoning logic must encode binding structures as well as their associated notions of scope, free and bound variables, and capture-avoiding substitution. Further, to support arguments about provability, the reasoning logic should possess strong mechanisms for constructing proofs by induction and co-induction. We provide these capabilities here by using a logic called G which represents relations over lambda-terms via definitions of atomic judgments, contains inference rules for induction and co-induction, and includes a special generic quantifier. We show how provability in the specification logic can be transparently encoded in G. We also describe an interactive theorem prover called Abella that implements G and this two-level logic approach and we present several examples that demonstrate the efficacy of Abella in reasoning about computations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Nominal Abstraction

Recursive relational specifications are commonly used to describe the computational structure of formal systems. Recent research in proof theory has identified two features that facilitate direct, logic-based reasoning about such descriptions: the interpretation of atomic judgments through recursive definitions and an encoding of binding constructs via generic judgments. However, logics encompassing these two features do not currently allow for the definition of relations that embody dynamic aspects related to binding, a capability needed in many reasoning tasks. We propose a new relation between terms called nominal abstraction as a means for overcoming this deficiency. We incorporate nominal abstraction into a rich logic also including definitions, generic quantification, induction, and co-induction that we then prove to be consistent. We present examples to show that this logic can provide elegant treatments of binding contexts that appear in many proofs, such as those establishing properties of typing calculi and of arbitrarily cascading substitutions that play a role in reducibility arguments.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Redundancies in Dependently Typed Lambda Calculi and Their Relevance to Proof Search

Dependently typed lambda calculi such as the Logical Framework (LF) are capable of representing relationships between terms through types. By exploiting the "formulas-as-types" notion, such calculi can also encode the correspondence between formulas and their proofs in typing judgments. As such, these calculi provide a natural yet powerful means for specifying varied formal systems. Such specifications can be transformed into a more direct form that uses predicate formulas over simply typed lambda-terms and that thereby provides the basis for their animation using conventional logic programming techniques. However, a naive use of this idea is fraught with inefficiencies arising from the fact that dependently typed expressions typically contain much redundant typing information. We investigate syntactic criteria for recognizing and, hence, eliminating such redundancies. In particular, we identify a property of bound variables in LF types called "rigidity" and formally show that checking that instantiations of such variables adhere to typing restrictions is unnecessary for the purpose of ensuring that the overall expression is well-formed. We show how to exploit this property in a translation based approach to executing specifications in the Twelf language. Recognizing redundancy is also relevant to devising compact representations of dependently typed expressions. We highlight this aspect of our work and discuss its connection with other approaches proposed in this context.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access